What tools do you use to monitor a Ubuntu web server? More specifically, I'd like to monitor server uptime, resource usage (RAM, CPU, bandwidth, etc.), Apache, MySQL and PHP.
Nagios is my favorite tool for monitoring. It can monitor web servers,services,hosts and so on. It is highly customizable and there are lot plugins available for various purpose.
Some features of nagios:
- Monitor network services (SMTP, POP3, HTTP, NNTP, PING, etc.)
- Monitor host resources (processor load, disk usage, etc.)
- Allow for simple plugin design
- Do parallelized service checks
- Define a network host hierarchy using
- Contact administrators when service or host problems occur
- Define event handlers to be run during service or host events for proactive problem resolution
- Automated log file rotation
- Support the implementation of redundant monitoring hosts
- Offer an optional web interface for viewing current network status, notification and problem history, log file, etc
Here is an online demo: http://nagioscore.demos.nagios.com/
munin and its plugins are all you need.
It checks resources (like the others do) but unlike them, it's completely non-interactive. It writes out a batch of HTML files and graphs each time it updates. You can automatically zip these up and email them to you (the script would have to be your work but it would be simple) or you can make them available through Apache et al (just bind a virtualhost's root to
The huge advantage over other (interactive) avenues is it's not a security risk. Running Webmin (as one example) means there's a process running that people can communicate with. That's an attack vector into your system. And being a fairly popular application means it's well targeted by people that script-hack servers.
It might be a bit "tinfoil hat" but security really is much easier to work with when you've only got a couple of vectors to cover.
It depends on the needs. But this is my monitoring stack
- Nagios: I use nagios as a centralized monitoring system to check the health of each servers. It alerts me if somethings goes wrong. For example, I have alerts set for situations like if my response time to a API goes beyond a threshold value.
- Monit: If something goes totally crazy, monit takes care of it. Suppose any component of my stack goes down. It alerts me and also bring it up for me.
- Logstash: Any suspicious activity recorded in my logs, it lets me know.
- SeaLion: Now all the above lets me know if there was a problem with my stack. But what caused the problem, I debug with SeaLion. Earlier I use to log the outputs of system profiling tools like
netstatetc in files. But managing that huge logs was becoming impossible for me. SeaLion execute all these commands and show it in a beautiful timeline format. Also to mention that installation is so damn easy and simple.
If you need something that scales (in other words, you may end up monitoring multiple webservers, dns servers, etc), then I recommend Cacti.
It has steeper-than-most learning curve, but I've used it in the past to collect 800+ statistics every minute from various sources. The collection process, since it's threaded, completes in about 40 seconds.
It uses RRDtool to graph the sources. It's web based and it's in the repositories.
I like to use a package that most people will probably use called Webmin
It's a web based program that allows you to monitor almost any server stats, it allows you to change power options (like shutdown, restart). You can add users, start/stop services and almost anything you would need to do for a server. I recommend you give it a try!
Here is a good tutorial to install it
It says Jaunty, but should work with any version of Ubuntu :)
Webmin is considered highly insecure, however.
"What tools do you use to monitor a Ubuntu web server?"
I prefer homegrown solutions to the big, bulky packages like Nagios, which have the tendency to inundate my already inundated inbox. I have a little Ubuntu Linux box running on my local network:
It collects information from other boxes (including web servers) using custom-built scripts and then sends an e-mail to a local user. It runs Postfix (SMTP) and Dovecot (POP3) so Postfix receives the e-mail and delivers it to Dovecot. Then I use Thunderbird on my desktop to point at Dovecot and retrieve the messages that are generated.
I've found that unless I do the custom-built thing, I end up receiving a zillion messages that I just ignore even if there is a problem that I need to look at. Pretty graphs are nice, but being told precisely what the problem is happens to be way better. However, refined control like this is only possible with custom-built software.
protected by fossfreedom♦ Oct 5 '13 at 6:35
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?