I found that there are at least two methods to clone a USB stick: (with /dev/sdb as the source while /dev/sdc the target)

  1. Cloning with cp:

    sudo cp /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
  2. Cloning with dd:

    sudo dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/sdc bs=4096

Are there any significant differences between the two commands and why is dd preferred over cp?

1 Answer 1


In this case, the difference is that dd is constrained to reading 4096-byte blocks at a time, since you have used bs=4096. The likely effect is that dd will be much, much slower than cp. Try with a larger block size (10M, 50M?).

The particular buffer size that's best suited for the current devices might be different from cp's (or cat's). You can't easily control cp's buffering. dd's utility shines when:

  • you have very large devices to copy, so that experimenting to determine the best block-size is worthwhile.
  • you have to copy only part of a disk. You can specify count to limit how many blocks are copied.
  • you want to resume an interrupted copy. You can't do so with cp, but you can try with dd, by using the seek and skip options.
  • you want to pipe it to the standard input of something (admittedly, cat will work here too):

    dd if=/dev/sda bs=10M | ssh host dd of=/dev/sdb

dd usefulness is very well discussed in this Unix and Linux post: dd vs cat — is dd still relevant these days?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .