Is there an easy way to log all activity that occurs from a shell script to a file?

I have a script. It outputs things like echo "instructions", as well as other program output. I know the commands:

command | tee -a "$log_file"


command >> logifle.log

What I'm asking is whether there is a shell parameter for logging, or a set command I can use or something like that. I don't necessarily want to add dozens of redirects or tee to files if I don't have to. I still want to get std output though - I just also want it to be logged.:wq

  • 5
    LOL, :wq like I were in vim' – j0h Mar 3 '16 at 13:33
  • 1
    it boggles my mind that most people seem to do that instead of :x – ell Nov 28 '17 at 20:41
up vote 17 down vote accepted

if you normally run your script with, try running it (assuming it's a bash script) with bash -x If you want everything redirected to file, try bash -x > file.log 2>&1 (note I'm redirecting stderr as well, remove the 2>&1 if you don't want this). If you also want to see what's going on, bash -x 2>&1 | tee log.file.

There is a very easy and handy way:

Using script to make typescript of terminal session

  1. Start the command script

    If the argument file is given, eg script ~/tmp/output, script saves the dialogue in this file. If no filename is given, the dialogue is saved in the file typescript

  2. Start your script or what ever you want to start

  3. If your script is finished, stop script via Ctrl-D

  4. Check the output in the default output file typescript

To start your command in one step with script, use the parameter -c

    Run the COMMAND rather than an interactive 
    shell. This makes it easy for a script to capture
    the output of a program that behaves differently
    when its stdout is not a tty.

The usage of scriptinside your script makes no sense because script forks the shell or starts a new shell.

If the variable SHELL exists, the shell forked by script will be that shell. If SHELL is not set, the Bourne shell is assumed. (Most shells set this variable automatically).

  • 4
    @Fabby I like my answer, but I don't see the little gray thing ;) – A.B. Jul 30 '15 at 17:43
  • I use script logfilename, so I get to pick it. – waltinator Jul 30 '15 at 20:23
  • can I call "script" from my shell program? – j0h Jul 30 '15 at 21:24
  • This makes no sense, see my improved answer. – A.B. Jul 31 '15 at 5:05
  • I would like to run the command from inside the script , I will look into script this evening. – j0h Aug 4 '15 at 21:30

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.