Let's say I have a PPA package that depends on the libtool executable to build. In Vivid, this executable is provided by the libtool-bin package. For earlier Ubuntu versions, it is provided by the libtool package.

Using a substitution variable like ${dist:BuildDepends} is apparently only possible for Depends, but not for Build-Depends. So how do I specify the Build-Depends in the control file of my package to work with both Vivid (Build-Depends: libtool-bin) and earlier versions (Build-Depends: libtool)?

  • If you're checking lsb-release, you could get the distribution code and check if it is greater than 14.04.
    – muru
    Feb 16 '15 at 20:04
  • @muru: Thanks, I tried that, but substitution variables apparently do not work for Build-Depends, only for Depends. I updated the question.
    – fwalch
    Feb 17 '15 at 10:22
  • 1
    Did you try an OR: Build-Depends: libtool-bin (>= 2.4.2-1.10) | libtool (< 2.4.2-1.10)?
    – muru
    Feb 19 '15 at 22:21
  • 2
    @muru: Nice trick.. let's hope they don't backport a newer libtool version to e.g. utopic. If you post it as an answer, I'll accept it. Since I saw you at vi.SE, you might be interested to know that I used this to build the Neovim PPA at code.launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/unstable :-)
    – fwalch
    Feb 21 '15 at 0:23
  • 1
    @muru: Neovim uses .nvimrc and .nvim/ for configuration. The executable is nvim. For Python-based plugins (e.g. YouCompleteMe), you need to pip install neovim. The terminal UI has been re-implemented (for the "why", see e.g. here) a few days ago, so you might encounter some bugs in that area. Other than that, if you have any questions/problems, just post them at github.com/neovim/neovim. You can find some links to documentation at neovim.org/doc. I have been using Neovim since summer last year, and it works pretty well :-).
    – fwalch
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:04

In the case libtool/libtool-bin, I think an OR relation might work:

Build-Depends: libtool-bin (>= 2.4.2-1.10) | libtool (<< 2.4.2-1.10)

The version numbers are that of utopic, when the split was imported from Debian. Note that in 2.4.2-1.10, libtool still depends on libtool-bin. The dependency was reversed in 2.4.2-1.11, which is why this change is now needed.

Depending on what you do, it might be simpler and safer to add a combined libtool to a separate PPA and depend on it. Since this is a B-D, it needn't be installed by your end-users, so depending on a separate PPA should be safe.

This site is temporarily in read only mode and not accepting new answers.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .