I'm wondering to know that what difference is the between using + and ; at the end of -exec command when I use in find command?

find .... -exec ... \; 


find .... -exec ... + 

-exec ... \; will run one item after another. So if you have three files, the exec line will run three times.

-exec ... {} + is for commands that can take more than one file at a time (eg cat, stat, ls). The files found by find are chained together like an xargs command. This means less forking out and for small operations, can mean a substantial speedup.

Here's a performance demo catting 10,000 empty files.

$ mkdir testdir
$ touch testdir/{0000..9999}

$ time find testdir/ -type f -exec cat {} \;
real    0m8.622s
user    0m0.452s
sys     0m8.288s

$ time find testdir/ -type f -exec cat {} +
real    0m0.052s
user    0m0.015s
sys     0m0.037s

Again this only works on commands that can take multiple filenames. You can work out if your command is like that by looking at its manpage. Here's the synopsis from man cat:

       cat [OPTION]... [FILE]...

The ellipsis on [FILE]... means it can take more than one file.

+ can only be used on single commands and you must have exactly one {} in the line. \; can operate with multiple zero-to-many groups.

  • 3
    Example: with \;, the executed command would be cat 1; cat 2; cat 3. With +, the executed command would be cat 1 2 3. – Alaa Ali Dec 10 '14 at 13:46
  • AFAIK, the + is not POSIX, so may not be available on non-Linux systems. Not a concern if you never leave the platform, but good to know if you ever have to use Solaris. :) – Simon Richter Dec 11 '14 at 2:57
  • Oh nice, thanks for the info. I typically -exec <command> {} ';' because its easier on my typing (I can touch type but I don't exactly have the best technique). – hanetzer Dec 11 '14 at 2:58
  • 2
    @SimonRichter: No, -exec ... {} + is POSIX. See: pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/… – cuonglm Dec 11 '14 at 5:00
  • @SimonRichter The -exec ... {} + extension was suggested for inclusion into POSIX specs in 2001 and ratified into POSIX issue 6 in 2004. It's possible the version of Solaris you're used to is older than that POSIX standard (or just targets an earlier version). – Oli Dec 11 '14 at 9:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.