What is the difference between
More generally, what meaning does the
.d suffix convey to a directory?
/etc/init.d contains scripts used by the System V init tools (SysVinit). This is the traditional service management package for Linux, containing the
init program (the first process that is run when the kernel has finished initializing¹) as well as some infrastructure to start and stop services and configure them. Specifically, files in
/etc/init.d are shell scripts that respond to
restart, and (when supported)
reload commands to manage a particular service. These scripts can be invoked directly or (most commonly) via some other trigger (typically the presence of a symbolic link in
/etc/init contains configuration files used by Upstart. Upstart is a young service management package championed by Ubuntu. Files in
/etc/init are configuration files telling Upstart how and when to
reload the configuration, or query the
status of a service. As of lucid, Ubuntu is transitioning from SysVinit to Upstart, which explains why many services come with SysVinit scripts even though Upstart configuration files are preferred. In fact, the SysVinit scripts are processed by a compatibility layer in Upstart.
.d in directory names typically indicates a directory containing many configuration files or scripts for a particular situation (e.g.
/etc/apt/sources.list.d contains files that are concatenated to make a virtual
/etc/network/if-up.d contains scripts that are executed when a network interface is activated). This structure is usually used when each entry in the directory is provided by a different source, so that each package can deposit its own plug-in without having to parse a single configuration file to reference itself. In this case, it just happens that “init” is a logical name for the directory, SysVinit came first and used
init.d, and Upstart used plain
init for a directory with a similar purpose (it would have been more “mainstream”, and perhaps less arrogant, if they'd used
¹ not counting initrd
The ".d" is usually appended to a directory name to indicate that what used to be (or what could have been) handled by a single script or a single configuration file has been split into multiple files for the sake of convenience, but which should be included, or executed, together.
In cases where it's important which order they should be included/executed, the files in these directories sometimes start with a number, like "00-default" or "80-user" so that they execute in the right order.
In the case of
/etc/init.d/ it sort of indicates that the scripts in "init.d" should all be executed. Nowadays, however, the init system of modern operating systems is a bit more involved than that, but the directory name is still there.
As you point out, the ".d" nomenclature is puzzling and strange, and doesn't really have any place in any modern system -- you'll notice that most modern services have tended to drop it.
The reason the directory is
/etc/init and not
/etc/upstart is because Upstart is the project name, the actual installed binary is still
/sbin/init thus it would not make sense for its configuration to have a name that didn't match the binary.