468

Simple enough question: is there some shell command (or GUI method) I can use that, given the path to a file on my system, tells me what package put it there? Assuming the file did in fact come from a package, that is.

Bonus question: what if it's a file that isn't installed on my system? Is there, say, a website that will let me look up a file and see what packages, if any, provide it?

  • 6
    I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website – Marco Ceppi Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
  • None of the answers here actually cover the Provides: mechanism. In some more detail, a command like mailx or sendmail is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via /etc/alternatives. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/… – tripleee Jan 26 '18 at 4:13
439

You can use dpkg command to find out which installed package owns a file:

From man dpkg:

-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
                  Search for a filename from installed packages.

Example:

$ dpkg -S /bin/ls
coreutils: /bin/ls

You can either search with a full path or with just the filename.

If you wish to search for files not yet installed on your computer, you can use the Ubuntu Packages Search

  • 5
    I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups. – Daniel T Chen Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
  • 20
    Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, use which to find he program: dpkg -S `which firefox` – Lekensteyn Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
  • 1
    @DanielTChen, but dlocate may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to call sudo update-dlocatedb to update it. – jarno Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
  • 2
    If dpkg the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g. dpkg /usr/bin/java), try just the executable's name (e.g. dpkg java). – Dan Dascalescu Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
  • 2
    You can also use realpath to resolve symlinks, like this: dpkg -S $(realpath $(which <command>)). – Lars Nyström Jan 18 at 14:24
238

The apt-file command can do this for you from the command line. I use it frequently when building packages from source. For files provided by packages that are already installed on your system, apt-cache is another choice.

To install apt-file, do:

sudo apt-get install apt-file

Then, you need to update it's database:

apt-file update

And, finally, search the file:

$ apt-file find kwallet.h
kdelibs5-dev: /usr/include/kwallet.h
libkf5wallet-dev: /usr/include/KF5/KWallet/kwallet.h

However a much friendlier way is to use the Ubuntu Packages Search website. They have an option to "search the contents of packages" for a specific filename.

  • 21
    In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet! – user2097818 Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
  • 3
    @user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed. apt-file often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question". – David Z Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
  • 3
    For those from the Redhat side of the world - apt-file search <> is the closest analog to dnf/yum whatprovides <>. – ffledgling Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
  • I aliased apt-file find as apt-find long time ago and it's really handy! Btw, latest versions require root for apt-file update. – val Jun 2 at 8:38
43

There's also apt-file for looking up files in packages that aren't installed. For example:

apt-file list packagename
17

You can search the contents of packages included in the various Ubuntu releases on the Ubuntu Packages website. Look under the heading "Search the contents of packages".

For example, here are the search results for libnss3.so in lucid (10.04):

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libnss3.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=lucid&arch=any

  • This recently just returns an error. – Pawel Veselov May 7 at 19:23
13

You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center.

Using dpkg:

dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
dpkg -S tracker-extract
dpkg -S tracker-miner-fs

Example

% dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store

Using apt-file:

apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store

or also possible:

apt-file search --regex /tracker-extract$
apt-file search --regex /tracker-miner-fs$

Example

% apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store

Or online here, in the section Search the contents of packages.

enter image description here

Example

enter image description here

  • You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :) – ReyKev Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
  • Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin – ReyKev Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
4

This is an extension to Alexx Roche's excellent answer. I tried to make an edit to that answer, but it got rejected (though not by Alexx)


I was trying to track down what installed which on my system. After a little work I created /usr/local/bin/apt-whatprovides

#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"

BINARY="$(realpath $(which $@) 2>/dev/null)"
[ -z "$BINARY" ] && BINARY="$@"
echo Searching for $BINARY
PACKAGE="$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":.*[^-.a-zA-Z0-9]${BINARY}$")"
echo "${PACKAGE}"

Though for most THINGs that are installed you can just use:

apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING)) | grep 'THING$'

For THINGs that are not installed, you can use:

apt-file search THING | grep '/THING$'

The apt-whatprovides script works for files that are and are not on your system. For example, my system lacked dig but had ping so this it what resulted:

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides ping
Searching for /bin/ping
inetutils-ping: /bin/ping
iputils-ping: /bin/ping

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides dig
Searching for dig
dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
epic4: /usr/share/epic4/script/dig
epic4-help: /usr/share/epic4/help/8_Scripts/dig
knot-dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig

Notice that Searching for is a complete path for ping (installed) and just the binary name for dig not installed. This helped me discover that I needed to install dnsutils without needing to go search https://packages.ubuntu.com/#search_contents

  • This is such a good answer that I should delete mine! – Alexx Roche Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
3

I was trying to track down what installed which on my system. After a little work I created apt-whatprovides

#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"

BINARY=$(realpath $(which $@))
PACKAGE=$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":\s*${BINARY}$")
echo ${PACKAGE%:*}

Though for most THINGs you can just use

apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING))|grep 'THING$'
  • 1
    Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it. – Bruno Bronosky Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
  • Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine. – Bruno Bronosky Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
  • Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.) – Alexx Roche Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
2

One reason you might have to do this is if you are compiling software which there already is an ubuntu package, you can run apt-get build-dep $PACKAGENAME. That will install all packages you need to compile $PACKAGENAME.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.