I have a custom package installed on my Ubuntu 10.10, and trying to remove it, I got:

$ sudo dpkg -r package
sub-process script post-installation installed returne an error state 127

(the message returned from the command was translated from portuguese(br).

So, I noted that on the installation script of this package, what it did was create an entry on my startup, create a folder on /opt and create a user.

I removed all it created. But now, I just want to remove it from dpkg list, because I want to make my linux like if I never installed this package.

How can I do this?


You may need to manually remove the package using:

sudo dpkg --purge --force-all package

Replace package with the name of the package.

Do note: its recommended to report a bug if the package is not yours or is unknown to you what the script does.

  • 1
    @jcomeau_ictx of course... the question is about post-removal, not about pre. – Braiam Jan 19 '15 at 0:27

trying to remove xmail with dpkg --purge --force-all xmail failed because the pre-removal script was exiting with a failure attempting to stop the xmail daemon. I found the solution here: https://serverfault.com/questions/179570/how-to-remove-a-package-which-post-installation-and-pre-removal-script-fails

specifically, I edited /var/lib/dpkg/info/xmail.prerm and changed || exit $! to || true

  • 1
    I don't understand the downvote. the other solution doesn't cover all cases, and this provides some help for the remainder. – jcomeau_ictx Apr 7 '16 at 13:47
  • 1
    If I have to guess, you answer "failed because the pre-removal script", this questions is about the "post-installation" script. You aren't answering the currently asked question. – Braiam Apr 7 '16 at 23:34
  • 2
    I had a problem with the pre-removal script and this helped me. – Bogdan Calmac Dec 8 '17 at 19:32
  • 2
    As one can expect, if editing *.prerm files is too tedious, you can delete them as well - uninstallation process works with them missing – Paulius Šukys Jan 24 '18 at 10:30
  • thanks, didn't know that! that's worth a separate answer, if you want to do so. – jcomeau_ictx Jan 25 '18 at 4:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.