(about ten years later) meet same situation on an old pc.
yes, ubuntu10 util-linux no lsblk command.
one workaround: get binary from other version .deb
I steal a binary from other release version (maybe ubuntu14) util-linux deb,
and it just work.
# I use x86 system, you can find other arch in same directory of this link
$ wget http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.20.1-1ubuntu3.1_i386.deb
$ mkdir OUT
$ dpkg -x util-linux_2.20.1-1ubuntu3.1_i386.deb OUT
$ ls -lh OUT/bin/lsblk
-rwxr-xr-x 1 chen chen 43K 2014-06-18 09:21 OUT/bin/lsblk
other workaround: compile from source
I tried util-linux v2.38.1.tar.gz.
not success, maybe system to old for the last version of util-linux.
I didn't try other version.
lsblk
is a default command.Why did you try to install it.lsblk
? What's the output ofecho $PATH
?lsblk
the output of echo $PATH is/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games