I was running the daily live Ubuntu 14.04-trusty-desktop-amd64 2014-01-24 on an Intel NUC D34010WYK. It has 16GB RAM and a Crucial 240GB SSD. Was working flawlessly, except for sound, so I started running the Systems tests (System > Administration > System Testing).

When I executed the Suspend test, the system did not automatically unsuspend after 60 seconds. It would not unsuspend by pressing the power button briefly. I can turn the NUC off by holding the power button down. But when I press the power button and power it back up, the screen(s) stay blank, with no input. I don't get to see anything: not the Intel NUC splash screen, nor anything of the Visual BIOS. Nothing. Nada. Basically, I can't power the machine back on.

What do I do? This is a horrible, horrible position to be put into. I never dreamed that Linux would kill my new PC.

I did some google searching, and tried using the procedure at http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-034211.htm under the Settings Were Changed in BIOS section, guessing that perhaps buggy code altered the BIOS. For a while I thought it was going to work: I was trying for an opportunity to hit F2 during reboot to reset the BIOS to the factory defaults: I moved the BIOS yellow "Security" jumper across to the pins to allow this, and by the time I switched the display over to HDMI input (for the NUC), I was rewarded by seeing a Grub boot screen, but in a weird display mode (very large text, pale grey). I even started booting up ubuntu, and got to the point where it said /home was missing (I hadn't plugged in the external HDD), when I thought I should really reset the BIOS to factory defaults, first. So I did Ctrl-Alt-Del to reboot, and got the Intel NUC splash screen again - but nothing else. F2 didn't take me into BIOS setup, and the splash screen just stayed there. Since then I haven't managed to get it as far as the Grub boot menu, the best I can manage is to see the Intel NUC splash screen, which just sits there. Or if I move the jumper positions back to normal, I see nothing, just a blank screen when I power on.

I'm wondering whether I'm going to have to risk trying to reset the BIOS to a recovery one, as per http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-023360.htm; but I don't know what filesystem to use for the USB key. I suppose FAT would be the safest.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by BuZZ-dEE, Eric Carvalho, mikewhatever, Maythux, Jorge Castro Feb 10 '14 at 23:46

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad so that developers can see, track and fix these issues." – BuZZ-dEE, Eric Carvalho, mikewhatever, Maythux, Jorge Castro
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
It appears that the previous comment mentioning a blog that may be helpful (blog.dustinkirkland.com/search/label/NUC) has been removed. Oh well. – user75601 Feb 2 '14 at 3:46

I found some Intel documentation (http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-034637.htm) that said that the system: "If you are using an HDMI monitor or HDTV that does not support a resolution of 1024x768, you cannot access the Intel® Visual BIOS Setup when pressing the F2 key." By booting up a 2nd PC and using it to set the DisplayPort connected monitor to 1024x768 mode and unplugging the HDMI cable to the main display, I could get the system to give me a grub boot menu. After booting Ubuntu, upon the next reboot, the BIOS screen appeared, and in this case it also displayed three options that weren't being displayed during this problem: options to hit F2, F7, or F10. I managed to reset the BIOS to defaults and the system now boots again.

I still think that it's pretty shocking that running a system test (in particular, to try to put the system into Suspend mode), could make the system unable to get as far as the BIOS, let alone the boot menu. A warning of this extreme-failure possibility would have been good on Ubuntu's part, in the system test; on Intel's part, not designing their BIOS so that the system could come close to being bricked like this is what I'd expect from a company that generally has very good Linux contributions and support. I note that of their NUCs, only three have this bizarre must-be-1024x768 mode problem. Especially since both monitors supported 1024x768 mode, they just happened to be not in that mode before the attempts to reboot. Kind of a double fail, by Intel, IMHO.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.