I Want to make the emacs minibuffer (where we type emacs command) vertical. Just the way we open a window by using
C-x 3
Is there a way to do this?
asked Jan 2, 2014 at 12:55
-
Really? :( Is any emacs developer willing to add this functionality? :p– Null pointerJan 2, 2014 at 14:23
-
You might want to get in touch with the emacs developers and tell them that you want this feature, we do not develop for Ubuntu we only help in solving issues with Ubuntu. This is a community of users, we aren't developers.– AlvarJan 2, 2014 at 15:14
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
Normally, each frame has its own minibuffer window at the bottom, which is used whenever that frame is selected. If the frame has a minibuffer, you can get it with minibuffer-window.
Well, apparently there's a way. Creating a dedicated minibuffer frame using the oneonone. This method didn't work how I was expecting on Emacs 24 where I tried as the 1on1-emacs. You need to load hexrgb.el first, otherwise it will not work. This is how it's shown:
As can be seen, it opens a new frame for completions, and for the minibuffer. I haven't figured out why when I switch to the minibuffer it doesn't change the scope to the minibuffer frame and instead tries to reuse the one that I have below. Maybe I'm not using the correct libraries but at least is the start.
Then I used instead a new minibuffer window. The usability of the new minibuffer window was rather null, since I had two minibuffers (and haven't found a way to remove the original) and the auto-completition was done in the main frame instead of the minibuffer frame.
This is the farest I went:
(setq default-minibuffer-frame
(make-frame
'((name . "minibuffer")
(width . 20)
(height . 80)
(minibuffer . only)
(top . 0)
(right . 0)
)))
(setq-default mode-line-format nil)
-
I agree with you, it's probably not doable as a window inside the existing frame. As a separate frame, though, it shouldn't be problematic, Emacs has supported having a dedicated minibuffer frame since the last millennium. What do you mean by “didn't work”? What did you try? Jan 2, 2014 at 18:06
-
@Gilles I tried again but with
load-fileinstead of just dropping the thing in a path (the previous problem was "Cannot open load file: hexrgb"). Now it loads, but is not the expected behavior. When I useM-x 1on1-emacsit just open a new window with the minibuffer, but doesn't remove the minibuffer of the main frame (same as the previous solution) and whenever I pressM-xit doesn't change the scope.– BraiamJan 2, 2014 at 18:34
As the Commentary in file oneonone.el says, just put this in your ~/.emacs:
(require 'oneonone)
(1on1-emacs)
You can also invoke 1on1-emacs from the command line:
runemacs -l "oneonone.el" -f "1on1-emacs"
(You might need to provide an absolute file name for runemacs or oneonone.el, depending on your directory etc.)
If you call 1on1-emacs any other way than during startup, it will be too late, as Emacs will have already created another minibuffer in its initial frame. That's the behavior you describe above.
Tip: If you use a 3rd-party library, it never hurts to look in the source-code Commentary for installation/startup instructions. ;-)
To respond to the original question: if you want a minibuffer that is to the side of some other buffer, then no, it is not possible in the same frame, AFAIK. But yes, you can use a standalone minibuffer for that, i.e., a separate minibuffer frame. And yes, oneonone.el lets you do that --- just customize the position and size of the minibuffer frame using the options in the library.
That said, I do not see why anyone would want a minibuffer on the side. Keep in mind that text is written horizontally. So it generally makes sense to have a window/frame that is used for typed input and displayed output message (echo area) to be wider than it is tall, not tall and narrow.
