20

I was so good with windows, now I’m feeling like a complete idiot.

I have an SSD for ubuntu and want to install the majority of my programs to a separate HDD but I have no clue how.
All searches I have tried only turn up with dual-boot installations.

  • (RESOLVED -> ) I am also having trouble locating "/etc/". Specifically, to modify Conky.
    Searching for this term only turns up instances where people are telling you to access this file, not how to get to it.
Improve this question
14
  • 2
    Take a look at This, it'll get you started.
    – Mitch
    Jun 27, 2013 at 23:04
  • I was of the impression that everything extended from the home folder. Whoops. That page you linked wasn't helpful regarding my issue, but i'm reading through it now and learning a lot, so thank you.
    – plaguedoctor
    Jun 27, 2013 at 23:28
  • I added the mount and fstab tags ; you can do what you're describing by manually setting particular filesystems to mount on particular partitions or drives.
    – belacqua
    Jun 27, 2013 at 23:54
  • @belacqua is there any other way than that? I don't just want particular file systems on another drive, I want all file systems of particular programs. That way I can sort them by how intensive they are of my system, having games/virtualbox/etc entirely on my SSD and things like libreoffice/thunderbird entirely on one of the HDDs.
    – plaguedoctor
    Jun 28, 2013 at 0:07
  • It's not so easy to determine where a given installation and its files might reside -- see the answers in the link Mitch mentioned. You can use things like symlinks as well, but my recommendation is to start simple. Find an example application, ask a specific question here about it (or modify this one to be less general), and go from there. Or experiment cautiously.
    – belacqua
    Jun 28, 2013 at 18:22

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
33

There is a major difference between Windows and GNU/Linux. On Windows it is common, that each program together with all the libraries it depends on is installed in a separate folder. This often leads to a lot of wasted disk space due to libraries being installed multiple times, for each program that uses them.

On Linux, programs are installed following the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS). This means, that the libraries the programs depend on are all installed in a common dedicated location, so that they are usually only installed once, no matter how many programs use them. Also, programs are built in such a way, that they all use the same version of a certain library. This saves disk space (and RAM at runtime), but has the drawback, that one cannot freely install programs on different partitions or hard disks, at least not without editing system configuration files (for instance /etc/ld.so.conf.d to include the different library folders).

Since the Debian package system was implemented with the FHS in mind, there is, as far as I know, no easy way to install Debian packages to a folder different from the one they were intended to be placed in and have them working without manually moving and editing files afterwards. This is, because paths are often hardcoded at compile time. So even if you install a package to a different folder, for instance by using dpkg --instdir=folder/ package.deb on the command line, the program will still look for its configuration in '/etc', not 'folder/etc', but the config files that were shipped with the package of course were installed to 'folder/etc'... The program will not be added to the menu either, since menu files are supposed to be in '/usr/share applications', not in folder/usr/share/applications.

You can of course manually configure and compile a program from its source code to have it install the binary and data parts wherever you'd like, while still installing configuration files to the FHS compliant locations, but this is something I'd only recommend for advanced users. If you are going to compile from source, have a look at checkinstall, a tool that automatically creates debian packages.

Another option, that was suggested on linuxfromscratch, is to unpack the package to a suitable location and then to create symbolic links to all installed files in the corresponding FHS locations.

Since in the comments you were referring to games: Many games that are not bought through Ubuntu Software Center come as an installer executable, and those can then of course be installed to any folder, usually a subfolder of your home directory. Windows games, which are being run using WINE can also be installed in any directory you want. For wine there exists an environment variable called WINEPREFIX with which you can set up numerous independent WINE folders, each including its own virtual C: drive. Read the WINE man page for more info.

Even if games/programs come as Debian packages, you can look at the package contents in your favorite archive manager. If the game is going to be installed in /opt, you can usually safely install it to a different folder, since /opt is often used as installation location for programs that don't adhere to FHS.

Improve this answer
3
  • 1
    Correct and worthy of upvotes O
    – Rinzwind
    Jul 16, 2013 at 13:46
  • 1
    Nevertheless, it's not complete, since I didn't explain in detail what would be required to get a package installed at an arbitrary location working, which files one would have to edit and which environment variables would need to be set. I'm just afraid that then it'd become a medium sized novel...
    – soulsource
    Jul 16, 2013 at 13:51
  • 1
    I would not bother. Just mount /etc/ elsewhere. It takes 90% of the disc load from the ssd.
    – Rinzwind
    Jul 16, 2013 at 13:56
6

TL;DR

  1. Boot the external USB disk with the version of Ubuntu you just installed and I'm assuming /dev/sda is your SSD and /dev/sdb is your HDD.

  2. Create a partition on your HDD to contain all the applications you want to install (let's say 64 GB) using gparted and I'm assuming this will be the third partition you'll be creating on your HDD (/dev/sbd3)

  3. execute the following commands:

    mkdir /media/apps
mount /dev/sdb3 /media/apps
mkdir /media/apps/usr
cp --preserve=all --recursive /opt /media/apps
cp --preserve=all --recursive /usr/bin /media/apps/usr

  4. sudo nano the fstab on /dev/sda1/etc/ to include the following right after the / entry (the root directory)

    /dev/sdb3  /media/apps          ext4   errors=remount-ro  0   0 
/opt       /media/apps/opt      none   defaults,bind      0   0
/usr/bin   /media/apps/usr/bin  none   defaults,bind      0   0

  5. reboot and test

The long version:

Unix / Linux / Ubuntu was conceived to be a server OS with a desktop as an afterthought whereas Windows was conceived to be a Desktop OS and the server came as an afterthought.

So the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard allows you to have an unlimited amount of drives / partitions to be located anywhere and bind them to the correct drive or partition with total transparency to the user whereas the Windows OS is limited to a maximum of 24 accessible drives/partitions (C: through Z: as A: and B: are reserved for floppy disks.)

Most applications you install yourself get installed in /opt/ and /usr/bin, so install Ubuntu normally and then use the below steps where I'm assuing /dev/sda is your SSD, /dev/sdb is your HDD and /dev/sdd is your USB stick:

  1. Boot the external USB disk with the version of Ubuntu you just installed.
  2. Create a partition on your HDD to contain all the applications you want to install (let's say 64 GB) using gparted and I'm assuming this will be the third partition you'll be creating on your HDD (/dev/sbd3)

  3. Mount that partition in a temporary directory:

    mkdir /media/apps
mount /dev/sdb3 /media/apps

  4. copy the existing /opt and /usr/bin to there:

    mkdir /media/apps/usr
cp --preserve=all --recursive /opt /media/apps
cp --preserve=all --recursive /usr/bin /media/apps/usr

  5. sudo nano the fstab on /dev/sda1/etc/ to include the following right after the / entry (the root directory)

    /dev/sdb3  /media/apps          ext4   errors=remount-ro  0   0 
/opt       /media/apps/opt      none   defaults,bind      0   0
/usr/bin   /media/apps/usr/bin  none   defaults,bind      0   0

  6. reboot and test

  7. If everything works correctly, reboot to the USB stick again and delete everything in the /dev/sda1/opt and /dev/sda1/usr/bin to reclaim the disk space still in use by now obsolete directories already mounted somewhere else.

Warning: the last command might also make your system crash in the unlikely case of /dev/sbd3 not mounting due to a HW failure

Improve this answer
8
  • 1
    Windows actually has the same support to mount drives on non-root paths, for about a decade now. And those drive letters could also be mapped per user, so H:\ could be a per-user home directory. No big surprise: the Windows NT line is inspired by VMS, very much a multi-user system. Nor was Unix conceived as a server OS: AT&T made phone switches. And UNIX specifically differs from its inspiration Multics in being less multi-user oriented at first - there simply was no need for that in a phone switch.
    – MSalters
    Apr 29, 2019 at 13:36
  • 1
    @MSalters Wow, didn't know the AT&T phone switch bit... I do remember the VMS / NT part and that M$ hired DEC's Principle Engineer, and the OS/2 part too, but before that, it was a Single-user pre-emptively multi-tasking Desktop shell. >:-) Updated!
    – Fabby
    Apr 29, 2019 at 17:28
  • 2
    Windows also supports non-letter drives (1:, !: etc.), as did some versions of DOS (with other characters, [: etc.). Windows is not limited to 24 partitions (look up volume mount points). Early versions of Windows (before 95) used cooperative multi-tasking, not pre-emptive, between Windows processes; only DOS VMs were pre-emptively multi-tasked (in enhanced mode).
    – Stephen Kitt
    Apr 30, 2019 at 5:12
  • 1
    I used to work at AT&T, in the UNIX group. It didn't start life as a phone switch.
    – stevegt
    Apr 30, 2019 at 6:10
  • @MSalters Unix does not seem to have anything to do with phone switches, apart that the responsible company developed both; and it appears to have been multi-user very early on, around the time the name was coined. See this answer on SE RC.
    – Peter - Reinstate Monica
    Apr 30, 2019 at 12:06
3

The solution I have used for my Chromebook is to not install packages, but rather, download their .tar.gz counterpart.

This may not be what you are looking for, but if you have a very small drive and want to split your vital software (GNOME desktop, web browser) from your additional software (GIMP, IDE, games) to save on some local space and keep your computer working without the external drive, it's the best solution so far IMO.

Improve this answer
0

With the increasing number of programs now available as AppImage files, you can of course simply download these to an external HDD and run them from there.

Improve this answer
1
  • 2
    As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please edit to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Error404
    Nov 14, 2021 at 10:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .