What are the advantages of using Shotwell? What are the disadvantages?


The specification for this decision is here

Here (Sorry, this show has been removed from Blip.) is a video clip where we discussed Shotwell (and other apps) at the Ubuntu Developer Summit.


Essentially the choice was made upstream (by Gnome). But there are a lot of advantages:

  • No Mono
  • It's lightweight and crash free
  • Better integrated with the Gnome Desktop
  • It has support for the RAW format
  • Some basic editing capabilities

As stated on the comment above the elimination of Mono from the default install would be a huge bonus, less occupied space, and less conspiracy theories evolving Microsoft and .Net running about.

  • 11
    Can you give some evidence that removing Mono was a strong motivating factor? That's a controversial reason, and you've listed it first and treated it at length. Jul 29 '10 at 10:03
  • I don't think that was a strong motivating factor, in fact I think it had nothing to do. I said that would be a bonus, the free space on the install CD would be a real advantage. As for the religious conversations, they're just useless. Jul 29 '10 at 11:20
  • Is tomboy staying? This runs on mono too, I'm lead to believe...
    – Marty
    Jul 29 '10 at 18:32
  • Shotwell is just better. Better capabilities and a clear vision. It's going to be a great app very soon.
    – Owais Lone
    Jul 31 '10 at 5:34
  • I don't think GNOME upstream had anything to do with that choice : both f-spot and shotwell are photo managers for GNOME, but they don't have any kind of special status in the GNOME project or platform. One significant difference is that f-spot is hosted on GNOME infrastructure (git, bugzilla, etc.) Aug 2 '10 at 9:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.