Or in another words, why isn't there a separate ruby-1.9.2 package?

Source info:


The 1.9.1 stands for the binary-compatibility version (and as you can read in the package description, ruby 1.9.2 is binary-compatible to ruby 1.9.1).

This is rather confusing - more explanations can be found here and here.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Thanks for the links. Ugh, that's all I can say for Debian ruby packages maintainers. – Paweł Gościcki Feb 4 '11 at 13:11
  • Yeah, most of the ruby devs I know do rvm, binary install on their own, or really goof around with manipulating environment path variables to get gems/includes/versioning to work. Think metasploit. – RobotHumans Feb 4 '11 at 15:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.