I have many JPEG files in a directory, and I want to convert them to PDF and concatenate them together to make a single document.

How can this be done?

I would prefer using the command line, as this process will be faster.


From the imagemagick package, use the convert command:

convert *.jpg pictures.pdf

You will get a single pdf containing all jpg in the current folder.

Install IM with:

sudo apt-get install imagemagick

source: stackoverflow

Edit: Note that images will be out of specific order if they are not numbered. if you have 10 or more you need to name them ending filename01.jpg...filename99.jpg etc. The leading zeros are required for proper ordering. If you have 100 or more 001...999.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Using the joker didn't work for me, I had to use @Alex's solution. – Eusebius Sep 11 '15 at 9:31
  • 2
    @Eusebius if the wildcard doesn't work for you with convert, you could use a oneliner like for f in *.jpg; do convert "$f" "$f.pdf"; done; pdftk *.pdf cat output final.pdf – Elder Geek Dec 2 '15 at 0:00
  • 1
    GrphicMagick users should run gm convert *.jpg pictures.pdf – michaelbn Jan 16 '17 at 9:50
  • 2
    Maybe my jpg files are too big and numerous, but doing that almost immediately consumed so much RAM that my 16GB system started swapping. – RonJohn Apr 12 '18 at 21:18
  • 16
    Note that this method may now result in a not authorized error; see this related question (and answers). – Jani Uusitalo Apr 16 '19 at 12:45

Unfortunately, convert changes the image quality before "packing it" into the PDF. So, to have minimal loss of quality, is better to put the original jpg into the PDF, you need to use img2pdf.

I use these commands:

A shorter one liner solution also using img2pdf sugested in the comments

  1. Make PDF

    img2pdf *.jp* --output combined.pdf

  2. OCR the output PDF

    ocrmypdf combined.pdf combined_ocr.pdf

This was the original commands with more command and more tools needed:

  1. This command is to make a pdf file out of every jpg image without loss of either resolution or quality:

    ls -1 ./*jpg | xargs -L1 -I {} img2pdf {} -o {}.pdf

  2. This command will concatenate the pdfpages into one document:

    pdftk *.pdf cat output combined.pdf

  3. And finally, I add an OCRed text layer that doesn't change the quality of the scan in the pdfs so that they can be searchable:

    pypdfocr combined.pdf

    An alternative to using pypdfocr:

    ocrmypdf combined.pdf combined_ocr.pdf

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Great method! The only disadvantage without compression would be that the resulting .pdf filesize will be very high (that is, slightly larger than all pics combined). But worth it if the document you're converting is really an important one! – Gokul NC Dec 23 '18 at 13:14
  • 1
    This worked fine after convert failed with "attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `PDF'". – Matthias Braun May 6 '19 at 15:33
  • 3
    img2pdf support inputing simultaneously many JPEGs. See examples in its manpage. – Yai0Phah Jan 2 at 10:54
  • 3
    img2pdf *.jpeg --output jpegsas.pdf did the trick for me, no piping or multiple steps, ordering was correct. I don't care about ocr though, but that coud be added easily. Thanks! – Jan Bühler Feb 11 at 8:52
  • 2
    @MatthiasBraun That is addressed here askubuntu.com/questions/1081695/… – yroc Mar 17 at 20:50
convert `ls -1v` file.pdf
  • This ls will list one file a time in a "natural order" (1,2,3...) and proceed with conversion.
| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I tried this and it didn't work for me. numerous errors indicate that it might have something to do with spaces in the filenames. – Elder Geek Dec 1 '15 at 23:31
  • 6
    To take care of the spaces issue, perform a pattern replacement first: for ThisFile in *.jpg; do mv "$ThisFile" "${ThisFile// /_}" >/dev/null 2>&1; d – Simon Mattes May 1 '18 at 13:06

Worked for me (BUT warning! turns off compression and resulting PDF will be big!):

convert page1.jpg page2.jpg +compress file.pdf

or even:

convert -rotate 90 page\*.jpg +compress file.pdf

From ubuntuforums.org, the +compress helps it to not hang. NOTE: the +compress turns off compression. The machine I was working on at the time seemed to hang ?forever?(I did not wait forever though to find out.) without the +compress option. Your Mileage May Vary quite a bit! RTFM on imagemagick.org option -compress, maybe experiment with -compress < type> if you have slow compression/hanging problems to find out what will work for you.

| improve this answer | |
  • 14
    Do NOT use the +compress option with the convert command as suggested above! It actually disables all compression leaving you with a PDF 10 times bigger than the original JPEG. Just don't specify compression options, and convert will go with the input compression format (JPEG) which in this case is the best option file size-wise. Source: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#compress – user335432 Oct 7 '14 at 20:25
  • That is not intuitive! Thanks S Minddal. That did work for me. I presume the machine I was using had a problem doing the compression then. I will adjust answer. – gaoithe Oct 8 '14 at 14:31
  • 3
    so $ converet *.jpg file.pdf worked well with smaller file size than with +compress argument – doctorate Sep 1 '15 at 18:02

Open jpg or png file with LibreOffice Writer and export as PDF.

I hope, this is simple way to export pdf.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Yes! LibreOffice is the best way to export image files to PDF. We have full control of the PDF output, including page layout, resizing of imported files, optional headers and footers e more... Many thanks to user359154 for the clever suggestion! – user371260 Jan 22 '15 at 16:59

The following solution also relies on ImageMagick's convert but is a bit more sophisticated because:

  • It allows all images to have different dimensions, while keeping the output PDF page size the same (A4 in the example below).
  • It centers the images on the PDF page.
  • It allows you to guarantee a minimum space between image borders and PDF page borders, to allow printing the PDF without problems.
  • It does not change the image data. (So image quality is unaffected, the PDF file has about the same file size as the image, and you can re-extract the original images later with pdfimages -j file.pdf img.) At the moment, this only works with PNG – see the comment by @dma_k below.


  1. Use my script from this answer to convert each image into its own one-page PDF file with A4 page size and 5% border all around.
  2. Concatenate all your one-page PDF files with PDFtk as follows:

    pdftk *.pdf cat output out.pdf
| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    This command shows that (at least with the versions supplied on Ubuntu 16.04) image data is affected: convert some.jpg -format pdf -compress jpeg generated.pdf ; pdfimages -j generated.pdf generated.pdf ; diff -sq some.jpg generated.pdf-000.jpg – Stéphane Gourichon Jul 21 '16 at 0:14
  • 2
    I was playing with GraphicsMagick and I have noticed that it performs image recompression. The quality of the resulting JPEG image on PDF page is much worse. So at the moment the safest way is to add PNG images – they are inserted correctly. See this post as well. – dma_k Oct 1 '17 at 16:55

I'm curious nobody pointed out pdfjam, which is a super efficient way to merge images/pdf into a pdf:

pdfjam --a4paper *.jpg

will create for you a pdf in A4 format for all .jpg files, usually named with a -pdfjam.pdf at the end. To force a specific output name, you have a --output <your output> option!

As far as I can see, there is no re-encoding of the file, making the command pretty fast compared to convert.

To install pdfjam, I'm not sure to know what's the most efficient way (it comes automatically with LaTeX), but you can try:

sudo apt install pdfjam

or maybe

sudo apt install texlive-extra-utils
| improve this answer | |

I have used http://convert-my-image.com/ The positive thing that you can provide (the same site but different page) an archive of images and concatenate them to the common pdf

| improve this answer | |
  • 9
    This suggestion has at least three problems: (1) it will be slow, due to uploading the images to the website and downloading the resulting PDF; (2) it exposes your data to whoever runs that website, and to anyone who may have breached that website, and to anyone on the wire; (3) it is not a command-line solution. – sampablokuper Oct 12 '18 at 16:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.