I don't know what the exact executable file extension is. Is it .deb or .tar.gz?

  • 15
    Not an answer but would like to add EVERYTHING in LINUX is a FILE so having Extensions as .exe never matters.
    – atenz
    Jun 26, 2012 at 19:23
  • 24
    @tijybba The "everything is a file" design philosophy is totally unrelated to .exe extensions not being needed for native executables. The former explains the contents of /dev; the latter is because of execute permissions and reliance on examining the inside of a file to determine what kind of file it is. Jun 26, 2012 at 20:57
  • @ Eliah Kagan - It was just a basic info since In Windows extension is necessary for execution , well in Linux it ain't , as far as Executable Permissions is concerned , it requires little more Know How of Sudo -User Access and Underlaid security concerns, which i guessed someone would clarify in answer as its latter part ,if at all needed that's why i posted it as comment not an answer.
    – atenz
    Jun 26, 2012 at 21:13
  • 7
    @tijybba But "everything" being a file doesn't really have anything to do with the topic of this question, does it? Jun 26, 2012 at 23:18
  • 2
    I guess i misread that part in question , which says " what is a exe file is in Ubuntu?", i considered Executable, but now with your eager help it seems it meant " what is a .exe file is in Ubuntu? ". If it is highly inappropriate , let me know i would be glad to delete it .( Mistakes are great learning experiences:D ).
    – atenz
    Jun 27, 2012 at 5:49

11 Answers 11

Linux extension Windows Equivalent Short description
[none], .bin, .elf(rare), .exe, .com(rare) Binary executables
.so, .o .dll Shared libraries
.a .lib Static library, for linking into an executable
[none], .sh .bat Shell script
[none], .pl, .php, .py, etc .cmd, .vbs Other scripting languages which may be used
.exe .exe Linux may be configured to execute some Windows executables using mono or wine
.deb, .rpm, etc .msi Installer package for the various distributions. Note that the packages in Linux distributions are more powerful as it supports dependency management and more.
.tar.gz, .tar, .gz, .zip, .lzo, .lz4 .zip (native support), other extensions/formats (via applications) Archives that can contain a program or any other files, and may be compressed
.ko .sys Drivers and kernel modules are loaded into the Linux kernel and have more hardware access than other programs.

Note that Linux/Unix doesn't tend to use file extensions on directly executable files including binaries and shell scripts, instead identifying the executable type by inspecting the file.

  • 2
    I've never seen the .elf extension but saw .bin extension quite often.
    – Calmarius
    Aug 22, 2014 at 21:36
  • 3
    While the other answers focus on the fact that 'any' file can be an executable, this answer really hits the nail on the head, whereas saying 'anything' can be an executable is not really informative or true, but rather exceptionalist. I could rename any file on windows to .exe, and it will try to execute it, but won't necessarily work, in linux its the same, if it's not meant to be executed, its not going to work... My issue many times is downloading a package, and not really understanding what to start, but off course, rtfm.
    – TrySpace
    May 21, 2015 at 6:57
  • 1
    You should add .bin extension (as Windows equivalent to .exe)
    – Dani-Br
    Jun 25, 2015 at 12:53
  • 1
    Then how do you download a binary executable if what makes it executable is not part of the file itself (the execute permission)? Do you have to manually add the execute permission to a binary file after downloading it?
    – GetFree
    May 10, 2020 at 1:04
  • 1
    @GetFree Generally, yes, you manually add the permission, unless you download it via some protocol that indicates permissions (like SFTP, maybe FTP?, git, etc)
    – nanofarad
    May 10, 2020 at 2:51

There is no standard File-Extention like an ".exe" file in Windows.

On Linux nearly any file can be executable. The file ending just describes (but not necessarily) what or how a file is "executed".

For example a shell script ends with .sh and is "executed" via the bash shell.

In your question you ask for .deb and .tar.gz Well, the .deb file installs software on your system (Please be careful!) And the .tar.gz file is a compressed file like a .zip that you could know from Windows.

  • 1
    So, .deb is a .exe file!
    – user54905
    Jun 26, 2012 at 20:14
  • 17
    @Nick, .deb files tend NOT to be executables: they're neither ELF nor "she-bang" scripts and they're unlikely to be registered with binfmt. Even with executable permissions, the kernel wouldn't know what to do with them. The fact that your file explorer can be registered to open files with a certain application based on the extension has nothing to do with them being executable (in terms of file permission or in terms of kernel binary format execution).
    – Bruno
    Jun 26, 2012 at 21:02
  • 6
    .deb file is also more like a .zip then like an .exe. The point is that .deb does not execute itself, it is extracted, interpreted and installed by some other application. Jun 26, 2012 at 21:23
  • 7
    That other application usually being the Software Center, which doubles as an installer. Linux is less dependent on extensions compared to Windows and therefore decides executability based on permissions rather than extension.
    – tyjkenn
    Jun 27, 2012 at 0:18
  • 38
    .deb is more like a .msi file than a .exe file.
    – detly
    Jun 27, 2012 at 4:28

The concept of an executable is different in unix/linux than Windows.


Anything that ends in .exe or .com becomes an executable file.


Each and every file has an executable bit, so any file can be executed, unlike Windows. To see if a file is executable, you can check its properties (Permissions tab), or even see them marked in the terminal (they are all marked with a *).

Even text files (like shell scripts) can have their executable bits set, and be run as one.

  • 5
    also worth adding that in the case of text files, the shebang (#!/bin/bash for example) at the start of the file sets which program executes the file.
    – jackweirdy
    Jun 26, 2012 at 19:32
  • Separate executable bits exist for user, group, and other. Use of these bits can limit who can execute the program. Additional bits exist for SUID and SGID to cause the program to run as the user or group that owns the file.
    – BillThor
    Jun 27, 2012 at 3:03
  • 1
    There are some inaccuracies above: 2) "every file has an executable bit": there are three executable bits (owner, group, and others), so one can allow himself but not others to execute a file. There is also a setuid bit to "execute-as-owner" and setgid "execute-as-group". 2) "any file can be executed": not so. the permission bits are a required but insufficient condition to successfully execute a file. An Immediate failure will occur for example if the file cannot actually be loaded and run (Ref: file magic numbers man magic , ELF man elf, and hash-bang line man execve)
    – arielf
    Jun 2, 2016 at 0:36

To find out what a UNIX operating system thinks a particular file's type is, you use the file command:

$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, for OpenBSD, statically linked, stripped

In the above example, I give the path to the program 'ls', you would replace with the path of your file.

A script file would look like:

$ file script.sh
script.sh: Bourne-Again shell script text

A random text file:

$ file textfile
textfile: ASCII text

An archive file:

$ file rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz
rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz: gzip compressed data, from Unix

It is even smart enough to correctly identify a windows program, should you happen to have one lying around on your UNIX box:

$ file FMZsetup.exe
FMZsetup.exe: MS-DOS executable (EXE), OS/2 or Windows

And when it can't figure out what a file is (but is able to open it), it calls it data:

$ file myrandom
myrandom: data
  • 1
    Not really an answer,but good side-"answer"
    – dlin
    Jun 26, 2012 at 19:37

File execution on Linux isn't related at all to the file name or extension. Any file can potentially be executed, provided that it's handled by the kernel's binfmt mechanism (and that its executable permissions are set).

The most common format for executable is ELF, although some kernels can be compiled for support of the old a.out format. (For full technical details, binfmt_elf.c is where to look.)

Another common mechanism is the "Shebang" system, handled by binfmt_script, which looks for #!/path/to/interpreter at the beginning of the file.

binfmt_misc allows for the registration of other handlers, as documented here.

If you fancy doing a bit of kernel programming, you can even write your own.

Although not directly related, the file command should tell you whether a file is an ELF executable or something else.

The naming convention has nothing to do with the executable status of a file (except when it's used for binfmt_misc registration). They're just conventions. Typically, a .exe file found on Linux could be a mono application, getting the .exe extension as a convention coming from the Windows/.Net world.

The other aspect that can happen when you want to "run" a file is to have the file explorer tool that you use register extensions to be able to launch a program that will open these files. This is what would happen if you double click on a .txt, .tar.gz or .deb, for example: the files are not executables nor executed, but what you use to double-click chooses which executable to launch to open these files.

  • I think this is better as a comment on the side of one of the more-inclusive answers.
    – nanofarad
    Aug 13, 2012 at 12:27
  • @ObsessiveFOSS, but does it deserve a downvote? No one had mentioned mono before my answe. No answer here really talks about how Linux executables really work (see my comment about binfmt on the accepted answer) anyway.
    – Bruno
    Aug 13, 2012 at 13:03
  • I did not downvote. I felt as the vote should stay as is.
    – nanofarad
    Aug 13, 2012 at 13:04
  • @ObsessiveFOSS, no problem. I've also noticed that the question had been edited since I answered it, changing a bit its meaning (I understood it initially as "I have an exe file, I can't run it...") and making my answer less relevant indeed.
    – Bruno
    Aug 13, 2012 at 13:09
  • OK. No problem.
    – nanofarad
    Aug 13, 2012 at 13:11

Linux does not use the file extension to determine if a file is executable. It uses a file attribute called the executable bit.

Any file can be marked executable, and when attempting to execute a file Linux will look at the start of the file to see what type of executable it is.

Types of executable files

  • Binary executables in Linux usually use the ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) file format. These are Linux's equivalent to the PE (Portable Executable) format used in Windows or the MZ and NE formats used in DOS and early Windows versions, all of which used the EXE file extension. That is, these formats consist of binary, compiled code but may be large and may embed other items in the file.

    Interestingly, the ELF file format also forms the equivalent of the Windows DLL file, because Linux also uses the format for shared libraries which contain functions callable from other executables.

    When executing an ELF format file, Linux recognises the file type from its magic number - the first four bytes are 7f 45 4c 46 - the 7f is included to avoid misclassification of text files. This is similar to the way Windows can distinguish the different executable formats that all use the EXE file extension.

  • Linux also allows direct execution of text-based script files, which serve a similar purpose to Batch files in DOS/Windows. Linux's scripting support is extensible in the sense you can install or create any scripting language you like and configure your Linux installation to be able to run scripts in that language, by specifying in the script which binary should be used to interpret that script.

    Linux installations have a default script interpreter available at /bin/sh which interprets any scripts that don't otherwise specify which interpreter to use. This script interpreter interprets shell scripts that adhere to scripting standard specified in POSIX, an initiative to standardize Unix-like operating systems. Historically Linux's POSIX-compliant script interpreter has been bash - an open source re-implementation based on the Unix bourne shell and others - with bash so commonly used that in the Linux community such scripts are commonly referred to as bash scripts, but other scripting interpreters supporting POSIX may be used at /bin/sh including dash.

    Other scripting interpreters commonly used in Linux include perl and python. Within the script, you use a hashbang on the first line to specify which interpreter should be used. Here are some examples:

     #!/usr/bin/env python3

    In the second example, /usr/bin/env allows reading an environment variable to determine the executable to run.

Executable attribute

The executable bit forms part of a file's file permissions, and can be specified separately for the owner and group of the file, or for world (everyone). A user who does not have execute permission applicable to them sees the file as a regular, non-executable file.

  • Whoah, I nearly answered this too. Look at the date, this post is a dinosaur. Jun 25, 2015 at 17:11

In windows, an .exe file is a computer file that ends with the extension ".exe" commonly known as executable file. When one clicks on an exe file, a built-in routine automatically executes code that can set several functions into motion. Exe files are commonly used to install files in the windows operating system.

Additionally, you have .tar files,commonly known as compressed files.Linux versions, such as Ubuntu use features prominently in various software distributions, with most software source code made available in the tar.gz format .From that you can assume that tar.gz is a form of the well know .tar format, which is used for archiving.

In Ubuntu on the other hand, the .deb file format is the one that behaves more like the .exe file in windows.When you open it the software center handles it's code and installs the program it contains, such as an executable file.

Even though you can still install software and packages from source format ( tar.gz), the best suited format for installing software is the .deb one.Take as example the Ubuntu Software Center; all the applications it contains are in fact .deb files.In general, in linux, almost every file format(including .deb and tar.gz as well as the well know bash files .sh) can behave as an executable file so that you can install packages or software with that.

  • 5
    I'd rather compare the .deb files on Debian-derived systems to the .msi files for Microsoft Installer…
    – MvG
    Jun 26, 2012 at 19:42
  • that IS correct! :)
    – dlin
    Jun 26, 2012 at 20:23

EXE and DLL files are portable executable files. These are based on the PE/COFF unix files.

Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable for more information.

In Ubuntu you don't have a specific extension for an executable file. These are generally files that are named after the application they relate too.

The important factor is that these files have the executable bit set. If you have a color terminal you will notice that these are a different color when listed using ls.

In the unix file system binary executable files are generally stored in there own location.

  1. /bin (core binaries)
  2. /sbin (system binaries)
  3. /usr/bin (application binaries)

whereas other application resources may be stored in /usr/lib/ or /usr/share/

A deb file is more correctly corresponded to an msi file in windows (i.e a package installer).

Generally tar.gz files or bz2 files contain source code from which an application can be built


Ubuntu equallant of .exe / .com file is extensionless file, usually some extensions like .bin ,.run etc are added to it for covinience

there are several alternatives for .bat file(almost all files),the most popular one is .sh

.deb is just an archive binary files(similar to .msi in windows) with debian standerds

.tar.gz is just a common archiving format used in ubuntu


Any filename can be set to executable regardless of extension, but the file needs to have the appropriate permission set. The permission may be given by right-clicking the file in Nautilus, clicking Properties, and ticking the "Allow executing file as program" checkbox:

menu item showing Execute: -checkbox- Allow executing file as program

  • I would like to point out that any filename can be made executable, not any file type as the phrase "Any file" seems to indicate. editing for clarity.
    – Elder Geek
    Apr 24, 2015 at 1:26

.deb Debian Package for Linux and TAR archive compressed with the standard GNU zip (gzip) compression algorithm; contains one or more compressed files; commonly used on Unix operating systems to package files, programs, and installers.

NOTE: TAR.GZ files must first be decompressed and then expanded using a TAR utility. They include both .TAR and .GZ file types.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .