It has always been my understanding that to use a disk or other storage device, it needs to have a partition which can then be mounted and used. Is this wrong? I inserted an nvme device in the machine and using the 'disks' gui utility chose ext4 and successfully mounted it to /mnt/nvme. My current situation:

lsblk returns nvme0n1 259:0 0 465,8G 0 disk /mnt/nvme with no tree under it with 'nvme01n/nvme01n1' or such like I see for say sda/sda1, and sudo fdisk -l | grep "nvm" returns Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 465,78 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors. In /mnt/nvme I can touch test, then ls returns lost+found test and df testreturns /dev/nvme0n1 479670976 73756 455161508 1% /mnt/nvme.

So it appears that there are no partitions on device nvme0n1, yet I can read and write files to it. What's going on? Don't we actually need partitions for anything??


One can create a filesystem on any block device; as you've shown, that could be the "whole disk" device. Usually it's a partition, once a label is written to the disk to define the partitions. One of the other uses of the label is to hold the master boot record, so an unpartitioned/unlabeled disk could never be booted from. So it's customary, but not required, to always partition/label big disks. It's interesting that if one tells ZFS to put file system on a whole-disk device, ZFS goes ahead and writes a label (with one big partition) anyway.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.