8

This question already has an answer here:

For a startup company I thought of going with Ubuntu operating system for 200 desktops. To reduce cost to the company I don't want to rely on Microsoft. Can I go ahead and install Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS for all my employees and run my office? I don't want to encounter any legal issues.

marked as duplicate by user535733, karel, Pilot6, Kulfy, wjandrea Sep 11 at 17:09

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 3
    Hi! Ubuntu is composed of almost exclusively free (as in freedom) software, but there are some trademarks and intellectual property to consider. Some packages available in the Software Centre are not completely free/libre open source software (FLOSS). In general this won't affect use of the software, unless you plan to redistribute it. Please see ubuntu.com/legal – Nmath Sep 11 at 3:10
  • 5
    Possible duplicate of Is Ubuntu Desktop free for a business solution? The answers are still valid. – user535733 Sep 11 at 12:36
8

YES

Yes it is free as stated many times here:

BUT

In a 200 person company at $100K per head (salary + benefits + cost of desk space) it's a 20 million per year cost just for that plus inventory, warehousing, offices, consultants and contractors. The $50 cost x 200 machines for Windows is the least of your concerns.

Your computer systems will cost millions for accounting, operations and mission critical applications.

Your senior executives will cost $250K + and will come with their own preferences for JD Edwards running on AS/400, or SX.e running on Windows/Linux or Navision on Windows, or SAP on a variety of platforms.

Chances are 100 to 1 the people you hire that know spreadsheets (a big part of business) will know Microsoft's Excel and not Ubuntu's offerings.

So the cost of $50 / seat Windows 10 is really a moot point IMHO.

  • 1
    You are correct that the license cost is probably not an issue in this scenario, but the increased productivity/usability on linux vs windows is probably still an issue. – user000001 Sep 11 at 13:26
  • @wjandrea I've edited the answer. OK now? – WinEunuuchs2Unix Sep 11 at 22:39
  • @Win Works for me! :) – wjandrea Sep 11 at 22:42
4

The $10,000 for the Windows OS on a volume license is just the start of your Windows related costs. For volume licensing, you will need Microsoft file servers, license servers, and an abundant number of other servers, all of which will need licenses from Microsoft. You will also spend a significant number of staff-hours per week maintaining that software, which is significantly more vulnerable to attacks than a proper Ubuntu-based network.

Also, the cost for 'inventory, warehousing, offices, consultants, and contractors' previously cited may not pertain to your business model. By all means, do budget for those if you must have them, but I won't speculate on what you will or won't need in whatever your line of work will be. I will, however, expect the cost of operating and maintaining an Ubuntu-based network will be even greater a savings than the savings from a free OS and free applications.

  • 2
    I feel like you answered an answer rather than the question.... – xyious Sep 11 at 16:24
1

I foresee no legal issues, but an important thing to remember is getting support. Canonical offers enterprise support but you'd need to pay for it. Of course you'd need to pay for this for Windows as well. My point is that there's more to the equation than merely the license to run the software.

Another thing to consider is that Ubuntu is unfamiliar to many people. In a start up environment I guess this will be less of an issue (I assume people are more tech savvy and willing to learn) but it's something to consider nonetheless.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.