Is there any setting/plugin/hack/workaround that will allow me to run Ubuntu with the Gnome 3.x/Gnome Shell desktop while retaining a rectangular 2x2 or n x m workspace grid instead of the default Gnome one-dimensional line-up of workspaces?


Recommended extensions for 3.32+: Workspace Matrix.

Workspace Grid is currently not being updated, but the developer instead recommends Workspace Matrix. Workspace Matrix has nice previews of the workspaces in the displayed switcher and a lot of tweakable options.

It holds the same benefits over Frippery Panel as Workspace Grid did (see below).

For 3.20: The extension Workspace Grid does the job. It is works flawlessly with 3.20.

Two benefits over Frippery Bottom Panel (which work well, cf. this answer) are:

1) No hacking required to remove the bottom panel.

2) In the overview, the grid structure is shown as the chosen two-dimensional grid. With Frippery Bottom Panel, The overview continues to shows a single strip of workspaces.

Workplace Grid. The width of the workspace overview is adjustable. Workplace Grid extension

Frippery Bottom Panel. Though a workplace grid is achieved, it is not shown in the overview. Frippery Bottom Panel extension


Pre-GNOME-Shell 3.10: With a combination of two extensions, it is possible. The downside is that you will have a bottom bar.

My blog post explains various ways on how to do this, including getting rid of the bottom bar (included below).

For 3.10 - 3.20: Go to extensions.gnome.org and find Frippery Bottom Panel. Install it. This will give you a bottom bar. Clicking on the right side will give you an option to disable dynamic workspaces and allows you to set number of rows and columns.

The cleanest way of getting rid of the bottom bar is by editing


and on line 6, change the height to -3pt. Save the file. To activate the effect, GNOME-Shell must be restarted, so reboot, log out and in or restart GNOME-Shell by pressing Alt+f2, enter the command r and press ENTER.

Credit goes to Brian McSweeney.

  • 3
    Nice! You can hide the bottom panel by editing ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/Bottom_Panel@rmy.pobox.com/extension.js. There, replace lines 787 and 788 with this.actor.set_position(primary.x,-h); and this.actor.set_size(primary.width,h);, respectively. – Rasmus Jul 2 '12 at 18:33
  • Sweet! I tried looking at the code myself at first, but was overwhelmed, but this is incredible! Thanks for sharing. – whirlwin Jul 2 '12 at 21:13
  • Could you add the basics of the answer in the answer, instead of just the link? – Nanne Oct 30 '12 at 10:10
  • @Nanne I've added the how-to. – whirlwin Oct 30 '12 at 10:20
  • 1
    @Erhannis Open this doc and search for alt+f2 for examples of various special commands: wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShell/CheatSheet The only ones I see are: lg (open live debugger LookingGlass), r (Restart Gnome shell), rt (Reload Theme), debugexit (Exit Gnome and don't restart, eg, Quit because I'm a GnomeShell developer and I know what I'm doing) – ThorSummoner Sep 23 '15 at 22:00

I was actually looking at this today, and the short answer is no. A hacky workaround is to have a gnome-panel running, with the workspace-switcher applet on it. This applet provides a setting for number of rows of workspaces, so you can create a grid layout.

I used to have a hack that was a daemon running in the background, which would handle this for me, so I wouldn't need the workspace switcher applet. It doesn't work any more though. However, I'll be rewriting it soon, so that it works again with GNOME 3.x, and using dconf/gsettings. It will only be configurable from editing the settings directly using the gsettings command line tool, or dconf-editor, though.


You can get a 1X1 workspace grid using the new WorkspaceBar extension I wrote. I will look into adding a 2X2 option if people want it. It would be small little buttons to fit on the panel.

  • 2
    I'm confused, What does 1x1 grid mean? Isn't a 1x1 grid only a single cell? (That sounds even more limited than what gnome 3 does out of the box.) – ThorSummoner Sep 23 '15 at 16:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.