0

I'm afraid my gcc package is not being updated (version 4.9.3 on Xubuntu 16.04). My guess is someone else or myself might have mistakenly configured it to hold itself back, but I don't know who to release that lock.

I know it doesn't appear to be locked in the synaptic package manager interface, so it must have been done some other way.

Could you guys help me figure this one out? What are other ways to install and keep out-of-date packages?

Output of gcc -v (all that long "Configured with" line looks suspicious but I don't really understand it)

Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.9.3-13ubuntu2' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.9 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.9 --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --enable-objc-gc --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.3 (Ubuntu 4.9.3-13ubuntu2)

EDIT:

apt-mark showhold has no output (empty)

grep "^deb " /etc/apt/sources.list output:

deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main 
restricted
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-backports main 
restricted universe multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-security main 
restricted
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-security universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-security multiverse

apt-cache policy gcc output:

gcc:
  Installed: 4:5.3.1-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 4:5.3.1-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 4:5.3.1-1ubuntu1 500
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

which gcc: /usr/bin/gcc

whereis gcc:

gcc: /usr/bin/gcc /usr/lib/gcc /usr/share/man/man1/gcc.1.gz

/usr/bin/gcc -v |& tail -1 (I don't get how this one contradicts the others, what's the explanation?)

gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4)

update-alternatives --list gcc:

/usr/bin/gcc-4.9
/usr/bin/gcc-5
12
  • 1
  • 1
    Please edit your question and add the output of these two command: apt-mark showhold and grep "^deb " /etc/apt/sources.list.
    – Ravexina
    Jul 5, 2017 at 19:08
  • 1
    @OdedSayar can you add the output of apt-cache policy gcc too?
    – Ravexina
    Jul 5, 2017 at 19:23
  • 1
    Please check the output of update-alternatives --list gcc Jul 5, 2017 at 19:38
  • 1
    If you solved your problem yourself, please answer your own question and accept your answer. Don’t put the answer in your question or the comments! Send me a message in the comments if you want my up-vote. :-) Jul 6, 2017 at 9:09

1 Answer 1

1

As OP found out themselves

sudo update-alterantives --config gcc

allowed them to choose a different default gcc version.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .