4

sometimes, apt-cache give "-dev" package, for example:

libdianewcanvas2     - a gtk+2 vectorial canvas with extra features
libdianewcanvas2-dev - a gtk+2 vectorial canvas with extra features

I am wondering when should I install the "*-dev" package? what is the different between libdianewcanvas2 and libdianewcanvas2-dev?

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
10

Let's compare the output of apt show PACKAGENAME for the two packages. I'm not showing the full output here, just some relevant parts:

$ apt show libdianewcanvas2 libdianewcanvas2-dev

Package: libdianewcanvas2
Version: 0.6.10-5.4
[...]
Description: a gtk+2 vectorial canvas with extra features
 Dia-newcanvas is a gtk+2 vectorial widget that has got extra features as
 compared to GNOME canvas:
 .
    [...]

Package: libdianewcanvas2-dev
Version: 0.6.10-5.4
[...]
Description: a gtk+2 vectorial canvas with extra features
 Dia-newcanvas is a gtk+2 vectorial widget that has got extra features as
 compared to GNOME canvas:
 .
    [...]
 .
 This package contains the header files and static library needed for
 development of programs using dia-newcanvas.

The difference here is **This package contains the header files and static library needed for development of programs using dia-newcanvas.** and actually that is exactly what describes most *-dev packages.

To sum up, you normally only need *-dev packages to develop your own applications based on the libraries a package provides. Other than that, I see no use case where you would want to install one manually. Of course it could also always happen that some other packages you install have *-dev packages as dependency so that it ill get automatically installed.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .