140

When packages are already installed and I run an apt-get install <package-name>, sometimes it will print a line <package-name> is set to manually installed.

What does that mean?

3 Answers 3

179

You can use sudo apt-mark auto $PACKAGES to mark packages as automatically being installed again, if you accidentally mark them as manually installed.

Automatically installed packages can be removed using apt-get autoremove (or using similar processes, e.g. via Synaptic).

2
131

If you install a package, all packages that that package depends upon are also installed. For example if you install the package vlc, it will automatically install vlc-nox. The automatically installed packages (in this case, vlc-nox) are set as "automatically installed" -- if you remove vlc, the package manager will suggest to remove vlc-nox as well (aptitude will do this automatically, if you use apt-get you can remove all automatically installed packages with apt-get autoremove).

Now, if you do apt-get install vlc-nox you will get the message that vlc-nox is now set to "manually installed", i.e. the package manager now thinks that you want that package specifically and not just installed it because vlc needed it. If you remove vlc, vlc-nox will therefore not be automatically removed.

This does not affect updates in any way.

3
  • 2
    Aaah. That makes perfect sense. Thanks so much!
    – codegoalie
    Aug 5, 2010 at 12:58
  • Is there any other way to install these packages? I have to install some packages to correct an unmet dependencies issue.
    – SY_13
    Apr 26, 2016 at 4:31
  • 4
    For unmet dependencies you can always use apt-get install -f - it installs all missing, unmet dependencies.
    – nerdoc
    Nov 15, 2016 at 19:07
9

It means that a package was manually selected and not automatically by another packages or a meta-packages. The difference it, that the latter can be auto-removed, when the package that triggered this install is not anymore present (after an upgrade, or because it was removed). A manually selected package should not be removed in this way.

This has no impact on the ability to upgrade package when such upgrades are available or the notifications thereof.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .