4

I'm working on creating services that can do a logical MySQL backup as well as a physical MySQL backup. The logical backups would be done every 4 hours while the physical backups would be done once a day at a specific time. Both rely on shutting down the MySQL slave which the backup is based on. They also need to handle not running concurrently. In addition, when boots/reboots, these should not be run not the first invocation.

Logical backup is using mysqldump and then uploading to S3. Physical backup is taking a snapshot of the EBS.

I've been running a simple stress case version where both fire at an interval of 1 minute. The database is empty and small. The EBS Volume is 1GiB. Both can be done in less than one minute.

I use a timer service to trigger the oneshot. I have also made each timer a Conflicts to each other as well as restating the timer in ExecStopPost.

An example of the service file looks like. Each one references the other

[Unit]
After=mysql-slave.service
Conflicts=other-backup-type.timer

[Service]
Type=oneshot
# Just arbitrary name for this example
ExecStart=do_backup.sh
ExecStopPost=/bin/systemctl start other-backup-type.timer

What I have seen via systemctl list-timers is that both timers are in sync. When both hit 0, one will trigger. What I have found is that once done, the other is will not be triggered. It seems that in this case, the timer is indeed stopped, but the trigger for the other oneshot never is made.

Is there a way to properly handle this without having to offset time? I have found if I make the time period offset slightly it works (seconds cannot be a factor of 60). I'm checking to see if there is a better/more elegant way of supporting this.

1 Answer 1

0

I'm not entirely sure if this is the 100% correct answer. I've run through a lot of permutations and based on this, I've come up with this.

Observationally, it seems that if I have 2 timers (A and B) which are setup as Conflicts= and also have a collision on expiration with another timer (eg. both setup to trigger every minute), then the one that triggers (let's say it's A) first stops the other and then triggers it's service. However this stop causes the would be trigger on timer B's service to be lost. I'm guessing that the trigger is pulled off some queue and ends up getting tossed in the process of the stop.

1
  • This seems to be what the documentation is saying also.
    – Lii
    Apr 11, 2023 at 8:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .