10

OS: Kubuntu 18.04.1 (and Ubuntu 18.04.1 in a virtual machine)

When I run osinfo-query os after installing libosinfo-bin, the output doesn't include Ubuntu 18.04:

$ osinfo-query os | grep -i ubuntu | cut -d ' ' -f -2
 ubuntu10.04
 ubuntu10.10
 ubuntu11.04
 ubuntu11.10
 ubuntu12.04
 ubuntu12.10
 ubuntu13.04
 ubuntu13.10
 ubuntu14.04
 ubuntu14.10
 ubuntu15.04
 ubuntu15.10
 ubuntu16.04
 ubuntu16.10
 ubuntu17.04
 ubuntu17.10
 ubuntu4.10
 ubuntu5.04
 ubuntu5.10
 ubuntu6.06
 ubuntu6.10
 ubuntu7.04
 ubuntu7.10
 ubuntu8.04
 ubuntu8.10
 ubuntu9.04
 ubuntu9.10
$

Why is that? And can I somehow update something to get Ubuntu 18.04 included?

The reason I'm asking is because of:

Next we passed the --os-variant option. While this is not mandatory, is highly recommended to use it, since it can improve performance of the virtual machine. The option will try to fine tune the guest to the specific OS version. If the option is not passed, the program will attempt to auto-detect the correct value from the installation media.

which I read in How to create and manage KVM virtual machines from CLI.

In response to Rinzwind's answer, the output of locate after running sudo updatedb is:

$ locate libosinfo
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosinfo-1.0.so.0
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosinfo-1.0.so.0.1001.0
/usr/share/doc/gir1.2-libosinfo-1.0
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-1.0-0
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-bin
/usr/share/doc/gir1.2-libosinfo-1.0/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/gir1.2-libosinfo-1.0/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-1.0-0/NEWS.gz
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-1.0-0/README
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-1.0-0/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-1.0-0/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-bin/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libosinfo-bin/copyright
/var/cache/apt/archives/libosinfo-bin_1.1.0-1_amd64.deb
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gir1.2-libosinfo-1.0:amd64.list
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gir1.2-libosinfo-1.0:amd64.md5sums
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-1.0-0:amd64.list
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-1.0-0:amd64.md5sums
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-1.0-0:amd64.shlibs
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-1.0-0:amd64.symbols
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-1.0-0:amd64.triggers
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-bin.list
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libosinfo-bin.md5sums

Neither /usr/share/libosinfo/db or /etc/libosinfo/db are present.


Running locate os-info as suggested by Rinzwind did the job:

$ locate osinfo | grep ubuntu
/usr/share/osinfo/install-script/ubuntu.com
/usr/share/osinfo/install-script/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-preseed-jeos.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-10.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-10.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-11.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-11.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-12.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-12.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-13.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-13.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-14.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-14.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-15.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-16.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-17.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-17.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-4.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-5.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-5.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-6.06.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-6.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-7.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-7.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-8.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-8.10.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-9.04.xml
/usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-9.10.xml
$ 

It should now be easy to add /usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-18.04.xml. Though it still leaves open the question of why it wasn't included in the first place.

2
  • 2
    I tried copying the 17.10.xml and editing it. Way too much info in there. Found it easier from the GitLab and just replace them. I did edit my answer a lot this morning as this was the first time I messed with the osinfo but I think I got something that works.
    – Terrance
    Aug 30, 2018 at 15:39
  • Because time travel hasn't been invented yet, 18.04 shipped with an osinfo-db that did not include it. Hopefully they will update it at some point. Aug 31, 2018 at 12:49

4 Answers 4

10

To update the osinfo database, which is actually just a collection of XML files, do the following:

1: Install package osinfo-db-tools to get the osinfo-db-import program (at least on Debian'ish distros):

apt update;apt install osinfo-db-tools

2: Download the newest osinfo-db file from releases.pagure.org example:

wget -O "/tmp/osinfo-db.tar.xz" "https://releases.pagure.org/libosinfo/osinfo-db-20200325.tar.xz" 

3: Import the downloaded osinfo-db file:

osinfo-db-import --local "/tmp/osinfo-db.tar.xz"

The new osinfo-db XML files will be located in /etc/osinfo/..

The osinfo-db XML files provided by the original distro package are still located in /usr/share/osinfo.

The newly path created by osinfo-db-import take precedens of the original path.

If you want to overwrite the original osinfo-db XMLs use the option --system instead of --local

(source)

1
  • osinfo-db-import also supports a third option called --user, which allows the info to be used by an unprivileged local user without affecting other users
    – JustATrick
    Feb 10, 2022 at 13:52
6

You could always take it from the GitLab site then replace it.

Might need to install the git, osinfo-db-tools, intltool and make first

sudo apt install osinfo-db-tools intltool make git

Clone the osinfo from the GitLab page

git clone https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/osinfo-db

Go to the osinfo-db folder

cd osinfo-db/

Prepared the os files

./prepare-release.sh

During the prepare it showed the following line:

osinfo-db-import --root /home/terrance/builder --system osinfo-db-20180830.tar.xz

So, I went to that folder cd ~/builder and it contained a usr folder. All I had to do was copy that folder to the root and it updated

cd ~/builder
sudo cp -Rv * /

And now it detects Ubuntu 18.04

terrance@terrance-ubuntu:~/builder$ osinfo-query os | grep -i ubuntu
 ubuntu10.04          | Ubuntu 10.04 LTS                                   | 10.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/10.04          
 ubuntu10.10          | Ubuntu 10.10                                       | 10.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/10.10          
 ubuntu11.04          | Ubuntu 11.04                                       | 11.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/11.04          
 ubuntu11.10          | Ubuntu 11.10                                       | 11.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/11.10          
 ubuntu12.04          | Ubuntu 12.04 LTS                                   | 12.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/12.04          
 ubuntu12.10          | Ubuntu 12.10                                       | 12.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/12.10          
 ubuntu13.04          | Ubuntu 13.04                                       | 13.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/13.04          
 ubuntu13.10          | Ubuntu 13.10                                       | 13.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/13.10          
 ubuntu14.04          | Ubuntu 14.04 LTS                                   | 14.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/14.04          
 ubuntu14.10          | Ubuntu 14.10                                       | 14.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/14.10          
 ubuntu15.04          | Ubuntu 15.04                                       | 15.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/15.04          
 ubuntu15.10          | Ubuntu 15.10                                       | 15.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/15.10          
 ubuntu16.04          | Ubuntu 16.04                                       | 16.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/16.04          
 ubuntu16.10          | Ubuntu 16.10                                       | 16.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/16.10          
 ubuntu17.04          | Ubuntu 17.04                                       | 17.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/17.04          
 ubuntu17.10          | Ubuntu 17.10                                       | 17.10    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/17.10          
 ubuntu18.04          | Ubuntu 18.04 LTS                                   | 18.04    | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/18.04          
 ubuntu4.10           | Ubuntu 4.10                                        | 4.10     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/4.10           
 ubuntu5.04           | Ubuntu 5.04                                        | 5.04     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/5.04           
 ubuntu5.10           | Ubuntu 5.10                                        | 5.10     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/5.10           
 ubuntu6.06           | Ubuntu 6.06 LTS                                    | 6.06     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/6.06           
 ubuntu6.10           | Ubuntu 6.10                                        | 6.10     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/6.10           
 ubuntu7.04           | Ubuntu 7.04                                        | 7.04     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/7.04           
 ubuntu7.10           | Ubuntu 7.10                                        | 7.10     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/7.10           
 ubuntu8.04           | Ubuntu 8.04 LTS                                    | 8.04     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/8.04           
 ubuntu8.10           | Ubuntu 8.10                                        | 8.10     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/8.10           
 ubuntu9.04           | Ubuntu 9.04                                        | 9.04     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/9.04           
 ubuntu9.10           | Ubuntu 9.10                                        | 9.10     | http://ubuntu.com/ubuntu/9.10
1
  • the tests our failing the build
    – shorif2000
    May 20, 2022 at 14:35
4

Because it is not available in the XML that provides this information. It is taken from 1 of these locations:

/usr/share/libosinfo/db
/etc/libosinfo/db
${HOME}/.config/libosinfo/db

(the 1st one I guessed ;) )

You can add a file ending on ".xml" in ${HOME}/.config/libosinfo/db and it will be included. Contents of it could be copied from a current already available OS.


The location of the file seems to have changed through the years. This is also possible: |

User location

This is determined by the env variable

$OSINFO_USER_DIR

If not set, then defaults to $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/osinfo If that is not set, then defaults to $HOME/.config/osinfo This location is intended for use by unprivileged users wishing to install local data for use by their applications

4
  • I edited my question because I couldn't find libosinfo/db in either of the two suggested locations.
    – DK Bose
    Aug 30, 2018 at 13:55
  • 1
    Do you have a /etc/osinfo? or a $HOME/.config/osinfo?
    – Rinzwind
    Aug 30, 2018 at 13:58
  • Yes, thanks! locate osinfo churned out quite a lot. I'll add that to my question.
    – DK Bose
    Aug 30, 2018 at 14:14
  • The default $OSINFO_USER_DIR has changed again since this answer was written, so that libosinfo/db seems to be deprecated. Using osinfo-db-import (as mentioned in @MrCalvin 's answer) with its --user option is probably the best way to always find the right place.
    – JustATrick
    Feb 10, 2022 at 13:57
0
sudo apt install osinfo-db-tools intltool make git
git clone https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/osinfo-db
cd osinfo-db/
./prepare-release.sh

pytest give faild test_urls.py is not connection some repository (fedora36, silverblue37 and opensusetumbleweed) when I use bash script prepare-release.sh

FAILED tests/test_urls.py::test_urls[fedora36] - requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='fedora.ip-connect.vn.ua', port=443)
2
  • This is a Ubuntu only site so how does this info on other OS help?
    – David
    Apr 13, 2023 at 10:22
  • You right, but when I try to install to give this error.! Only I want to install file script "prepare-release.sh". I use Ubuntu and Debian. do not use Fedora Apr 14, 2023 at 18:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .