meta user
network profile
| bio | website | l3.ms |
|---|---|---|
| location | Germany | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | May 14 at 20:56 | |
| stats | profile views | 12 |
Programming languages:
- C++/Qt
- PHP
To-Do list:
☑ Write a parser for a programming language of my choice
☐ Write a compiler for a programming language of my choice
☐ Write a linux kernel module
☐ Write an operating system
|
Apr 21 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 28 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Mar 24 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 16 |
awarded | Organizer |
|
Mar 16 |
revised |
How can I add an SSL client certificate/key globally in Ubuntu? added tags |
|
Mar 16 |
suggested | suggested edit on How can I add an SSL client certificate/key globally in Ubuntu? |
|
Feb 12 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Jan 4 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 9 |
accepted | Flash suddenly insanely jerky (but low CPU consumption) |
|
Dec 9 |
comment |
Flash suddenly insanely jerky (but low CPU consumption) Flash player 11.5 (pepper) works. I think I'll stick to Chrome/Chromium for Flash webpages + use Youtube in HTML5 version until I have time to move to a modern Ubuntu version. ;) Thanks for your help! |
|
Dec 9 |
comment |
Flash suddenly insanely jerky (but low CPU consumption) Ok the driver doesn't seem to be a problem. I also tried version 310 from the NVidia website. Trying Chrome now... |
|
Dec 9 |
comment |
Flash suddenly insanely jerky (but low CPU consumption) I already unplugged the TV. I have just written that I had it plugged in, since this is the only possible explanation thing I can think of. Thank you, I try to update the NVidia driver, let's see if this helps... |
|
Dec 9 |
revised |
Flash suddenly insanely jerky (but low CPU consumption) added 7 characters in body |
|
Dec 9 |
asked | Flash suddenly insanely jerky (but low CPU consumption) |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Recovering from RAID5 with 2 failed drives, only one of them really dead Now I just re-added sdc1. I tried this yesterday without success, however, today it worked and I could then --run the RAID successfully. Here is some command outputs: pastebin.com/pGaAV5rf -- I hope it keeps running while making some more backup of the most important stuff. |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Recovering from RAID5 with 2 failed drives, only one of them really dead @psusi However, I just noticed that today the creation command shows a different output: mdadm: super1.x cannot open /dev/sda1: Device or resource busy mdadm: failed container membership check mdadm: device /dev/sda1 not suitable for any style of array I think this has something to do with dmraid. I experienced "busy" errors before and found out that I should add nodmraid to the boot options. This helped yesterday, howver, today it doesn't. I'm confused at this point. |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Recovering from RAID5 with 2 failed drives, only one of them really dead I tried this, but... mdadm: failed to run array /dev/md127: Input/output error Examining sda1 shows a similar output than above, but with drive number 1 also saying "faulty removed". |
|
Nov 21 |
revised |
Recovering from RAID5 with 2 failed drives, only one of them really dead edited tags; added 100 characters in body |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
Recovering from RAID5 with 2 failed drives, only one of them really dead Ah and please don't tell me to better backup daily in the future. I've learned my lesson, believe me :/ |
|
Nov 21 |
asked | Recovering from RAID5 with 2 failed drives, only one of them really dead |
