meta user
network profile
| bio | website | islamicpaintings.blogspot.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Bangkok, Thailand | |
| age | 31 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 7 months |
| seen | Mar 10 '11 at 17:12 | |
| stats | profile views | 75 |
|
Mar 11 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 12 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Oct 16 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Sep 21 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Jun 15 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
May 8 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 24 |
awarded | Taxonomist |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Jan 13 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Oct 29 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Oct 28 |
awarded | Good Question |
|
Oct 16 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Aug 24 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jun 24 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
May 26 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Apr 28 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 10 |
comment |
Why is my Ubuntu 10.10 CD not booting? Did you check the md5 hash of the said CD? |
|
Feb 1 |
comment |
How to disable the WiFi using network-manager permanently? Duplicate?: askubuntu.com/questions/24171/… |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Technical differences between ways in which UNIX and Windows “mount” devices If by "new file system" you mean NTFS, then I think yes. I have used it since XP, but it seems you could do it on 2000 as well. Check: computerhope.com/issues/ch000038.htm and technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc938934.aspx. However, if your emphasis was on "core part", then that is beyond me...I don't even know what "core part" here means. |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Technical differences between ways in which UNIX and Windows “mount” devices Here's the answer to points 1, 2, 6 & 9: i.imgur.com/JFH8l.png. I've never really tried to mount anything to an NTFS folder (have changed drive letters) but it seems to counter those points. 7 - for which? |
