network profile
| bio | website | webatom.nl |
|---|---|---|
| location | Netherlands | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | May 22 at 15:07 | |
| stats | profile views | 8 |
Student and self-employed.
|
Sep 20 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Sep 20 |
comment |
Unattended grub configuration after kernel upgrade That did it, thanks! |
|
Sep 20 |
accepted | Unattended grub configuration after kernel upgrade |
|
Sep 18 |
awarded | Student |
|
Sep 16 |
comment |
Unattended grub configuration after kernel upgrade Also tried -qq, but also no go... |
|
Sep 14 |
comment |
Unattended grub configuration after kernel upgrade Also tried --force-yes and yes | ..., but to no avail |
|
Sep 13 |
asked | Unattended grub configuration after kernel upgrade |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
How do I fix a “Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock” problem? @jaime: probably apt-get (or some GUI frontend to it) was halted while executing, leaving apt in a locked state. |
|
Jul 1 |
comment |
user upstart job in ~/.init/ is not found How would I auto-start a user job on Ubuntu 12.04? I've found a tutorial, which worked for me on Ubuntu 11.10, but not on Ubuntu 12.04. Any ideas? |
|
Dec 8 |
awarded | Altruist |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
potential ufw and fail2ban conflicts So in short: without doing the integration as explained, both ufw and fail2ban work like they should. Fail2ban will insert its blocking definitions before ufw's rules are applied. On the other hand if one would like to have the blocks show up in ufw status, you need the integration. Besides having the blocks show up in ufw status, there would be no other benefit? Particularly because the author of the blog says the following:
Out of the box Fail2ban works with iptables rules, however these don’t play nice with our simpler UFW commands(...) |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Investor |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
