Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Whats the most Bomb Proof Security to protect h\d and data on it of all the programmes\options available.

Thank you all for what appears to be a debate. I am actually looking for a way to protect my data on my fixed H\D as far as a hardware option is concerned nothing is much better than a micro sd really.. You can simply eat it :-). However seriously I would be interested in a simple economic means to hide or make inaccessible certain directories and was wondering which was the best means to do this or at least make life difficult for who was trying to see the data. Thanks

share|improve this question
1  
Is is possible for you to specify your question? Currently it is quite vague and very general. For example, what kind of attacks do you want to protect against? What kind of hardware is it stored on? –  N.N. Jan 9 '12 at 19:37
    
Physical security, plus using the machine as a standalone box without ever connecting to any network. This is impractical, so be prepared to compromise with whatever answer you go with. This is one of those questions where you can ask ten people and get ten different answers. –  Tom Brossman Jan 9 '12 at 20:11

2 Answers 2

Encryption. The desktop CD will offer to encrypt your home directory when you install. For a hard drive you can use LUKS or Truecrypt.

There is a graphical interface, cryptkeeper, in the repositories as well.

http://tom.noflag.org.uk/cryptkeeper.html

enter image description here

There is a small bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptkeeper/+bug/575918

There is a patch on that bug report and the work around is to whitelist cryptkeeper in dconf-editor , relevant key is desktop/unity/panel/systray-whitelist

See http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10904044&postcount=6

share|improve this answer
    
Beware that there are ways to get past encryption, see xkcd.com/538 –  N.N. Jan 9 '12 at 19:39
    
Indeed, that is a classic, but, despite the shortcomings, still the best option. –  bodhi.zazen Jan 9 '12 at 19:41
    
I chose encryption on installation of 11.10 for instance but it must be very background as I cant say I have noticed it. Is it only encrypted if you try to examine the hard disc externally to your desktop? –  Antony Jan 10 '12 at 8:18
    
@Antony depends on the encryption, but the desktop cd encrypts your home directory and it is automatically decrypted when you log in. Boot a live CD and try to examine your data. –  bodhi.zazen Jan 10 '12 at 16:04
    
@bodhi.zazen I will take a look from windows that should show it. How secure is this encryption? Can it be retro effected to other computers I have a laptop running 10,04 I dont remember being offered the option. –  Antony Jan 10 '12 at 18:21

The best "bomb-proof" security solution for hard-disks is NOT to use a software encryption solution.

For security solutions, you need to use a hardware solution. For example (but not exclusively), companies such stonewood produce a hardware disk encryption mechanism that can only be unlocked via a separate hardware token.

As already stated, there are linux/open-source based solutions such as TrueCrypt and LUKS & dm-crypt.

Personally, GPG is a good solution for files & folders and is a portable solution.

share|improve this answer
    
Looks like Stonewood is now ViaSat, a UK company (Remember that in the UK you can be jailed for years for not turning over your encryption keys). I don't think I'd be willing to trust a proprietary device like that, either. Cool gadgets, but I could never fully trust it's absolute integrity. –  Tom Brossman Jan 9 '12 at 20:20
    
... I work with these devices day-in-day-out ... and no you will not be jailed for these encryption devices - very strange comment to make. They are mandatory in certain sectors (i'm not a liberty to say what). They have absolute integrity - I know the developers personally :) ... and no - I'm not a salesman, just a customer. –  fossfreedom Jan 9 '12 at 20:25
    
You might want to read the comment again, it's a valid point. I'm sure the devs are cool, but they are not immune from political and judicial pressures when making the drives. I'd buy one to protect my stuff from a competitor, sure, but 'Bomb Proof Security' it's not. I'm not disparaging the product, just making an observation and pointing out where their loyalties must be. –  Tom Brossman Jan 9 '12 at 20:32
    
I Think Tom Brossman intended that if a court ordered you to hand over the data or the keys and you didnt this would be contempt. Maybe the best solution is to make things as invisible as possible. After all if you dont know its there you want try to crack it right? Maybe there is a fairly good encryption system that renders things invisible? –  Antony Jan 10 '12 at 8:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.