Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Difference between 32bit and 64 bit?

So I've tried out the 32-bit Ubuntu 11.10 on my laptop. My knowledge with Ubuntu (and linux in general) is fairly limited. So I want to try the OS on my desktop. Which is recommended based on the experience I mentioned?
Main system specs as well:
ATI Radeon HD 5670 1GB
AMD Athlon II X2 250

P.S. I'm considering using the Wubi method.

To Clarify as part of a comment I mentioned below, I have had little experience with Linux before 11.10 (I Believe it was with 6.11) as well as a linux terminal interface from 2 of my routers. As I'm trying to slowly learn my way around Linux, my concern itself is if I run 64-bit and screw something up because I didn't know, as an example, an app wasn't made for 64-bit was the issue at hand.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Takkat, Lekensteyn, fossfreedom, hhlp, Jorge Castro Nov 10 '11 at 4:54

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Right @Takkat : this is copy of… . but i have post the answer of that post here . – twister_void Nov 9 '11 at 10:06
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The AMD Athlon II X2 250 processor is 64-bit, so you can run either the 32-bit (i386) or 64-bit (amd64) version of Ubuntu. You have enough RAM that you might well experience a noticeable improvement in performance even if you ran mostly 32-bit applications (so long as you multitask...which everybody does these days). And if you use the 64-bit version of Ubuntu then you'll be running mostly 64-bit applications, because by default you'll get 64-bit packages (so then you benefit from the CPU instructions that are present in the amd64 architecture but not in 32-bit architectures...or not in all 32-bit sub-architectures).

As of Ubuntu 11.10, multarch support is enabled by default, so you can install the 32-bit versions of applications or libraries if you need them. Therefore, even if you have 32-bit-only applications not provided by Ubuntu software sources (for example, a proprietary binary-only application that only provides a 32-bit version), it shouldn't be significantly more difficult (and would likely not be more difficult at all) to get that running smoothly on a 64-bit Ubuntu system than on a 32-bit Ubuntu system.

So 64-bit is probably the best choice for you, based on the information you have provided. But you're unlikely to go wrong either way...unless you have applications that benefit enormously from 64-bit support, like some scientific and computational applications.

Whether you install your Ubuntu system normally (which is usually the best choice) or with Wubi, you can use either the 32-bit or the 64-bit version of Ubuntu. Even if you're using a 32-bit version of Windows, your Wubi system can still be the 64-bit version of Ubuntu.

See the Ubuntu multarch specification page and the Debian multarch wiki page for more information on the multarch feature (enabled by default in Ubuntu as of version 11.10). See this listserv post and this news article for some more information about multarch in Ubuntu. See this question for general information about the differences between 32-bit and 64-bit Ubuntu systems (not specific to Ubuntu 11.10). See this question for information about why the Ubuntu website has referred to the 32-bit version as recommended.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.