Can I configure Ubuntu to never install a specific package even if it is required by another package I install?

link|improve this question

56% accept rate
You cannot install a package without its dependencies, unless you want to break your system. – enzotib Nov 5 '11 at 22:05
@enzotib, first of all you're wrong: package dependencies can be redundant. there are numerous examples, or you can have installed an equivalent of a required package another way (for example I have openjdk-6 installed as it is required by all the java applications in the repos, but I never actually use openjdk-6, I set up everything to use openjdk-7 or Oracle JDK 7 instead). And the second thing - I didn't say I want the dependant package to be installed - it can just throw an error in this case, I just want to make sure a particular package is never installed anyway. – Ivan Nov 5 '11 at 22:29
There is a similar question. – Nimmermehr Nov 8 '11 at 15:38
feedback

2 Answers

In debian you can block a package, and that package wont upgrade anymore

# echo name_of_package hold | dpkg —set-selections

but I'm not sure that you can forbid

link|improve this answer
feedback

As in Debian we can use apt-pinning for version and installation control in Ubuntu too.

To block the installation of a given package we may put the following lines in /etc/apt/preferences

Package: <nameofpackage>
Pin: origin ""
Pin-Priority: -1

By giving a negative priority for this pin we will block the installation of <nameofpackage> from any origin. Of course we could also use apt-pinning to pin a certain package version or origin.

Before you proceed it is strongly recommended to read the documentation given above and the manpage from apt_preferences because errors in these files are not checked by apt and if they occur it may break your package management.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.