Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

can anyone tell me which would be the better choice for my Acer Aspire One with Intel GMA500 video card? which would give me better graphic performance?

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by Luis Alvarado Mar 14 '13 at 16:52

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This question appears to be abandoned and unanswered. Could you perhaps add more detail to your question? If this question no longer applies then you can either delete it or answer it yourself if you've solved the problem. Thanks! – Seth Jan 26 '13 at 5:04

PSB_GFX is not yet a fully functional driver. Think of it as a prototype that you should only install if you want to help test and develop it. Reportedly, it has good 2d acceleration, but lacks 3d, xv and hardware acceleration.

In case you are a regular netbook user, the choice should really be EMGD vs PSB, with the former working well on Lucid and Maverick, and the latter on Maverick and Natty.

Check out the Poulsbo page for more info:

share|improve this answer
thanks. i was starting to get a bit confused because i have the emgd 1.8 driver installed and i saw alot of people were talking about this psb_gfx driver and i was wondering if i was using a outdated driver. i'm still new to this linux stuff. its only been a week since a switch from windows 7 – andrew Oct 18 '11 at 0:17
Ouch. You've sure not picked the best piece of hardware to start using Linux with. Despite the fact that gma500 is an Intel chip, which usually entails decent Linux support, Intel has so far refused to provide a working driver, either open or closed source. In fact, Intel has been ignoring the problems its Linux customers had with gma500 for the past three years. Welcome to the club. :) – mikewhatever Oct 18 '11 at 1:07
I've realized that when doing some research on getting Ubuntu on this net-book. if i had even know about Linux and Ubuntu at the time of buying a net-book i would have probably gotten one with more compatible hardware. just my luck to be stuck with a GMA500 card. hopefully my next PC (whenever i can afford one) will be alot more hardware compatible. besides i kinda like the challenge of having to word with this net-book. it forces me to do alot of research and learn alot about Linux. I've learn quite a bit this pass week – andrew Oct 18 '11 at 3:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.