Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I seldom have to print anything on paper anymore, so my knowledge about printers is really limited. Last weekend, I demoed Oneiric to my father, who still prints stuff, and even though his printer is attached using USB, I had to select the printer from a list. Why is that? I mean, if I attach a memory stick, I don't have to select it. It just works. Why is that no so with printers? For network printers, I understand why they have to be added, since a company can have thousands of printers when one user only needs to use a couple of them. But shouldn't directly connected printers just work?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

According to Ubuntu docs, things are supposed to happen exactly as you expect:

Plug your printer into your computer and power it on. Most printers will automatically be detected an configured. Once detected, a printer icon will appear in the notification area and after waiting a few moments, you should get a popup with the text "Printer is ready for printing.

Unfortunately, setting up a printer may be more difficult than mounting a flash drive, so sometimes auto-detection fails. In this case you need to add the printer manually.

share|improve this answer

You could always print to a file instead, or tell the system to use a printer in the network, which isn't automatically seen.

And since Linux evolved from a networking-server-system, having multiple printers available was very common for Unix systems.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.