Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
What's the difference between Wubi and a regular installation?

Why should a dual-booter do a "proper" ubuntu installation instead of through wubi? In other words, how is a "proper" installation better (for both, the user and ubuntu community/canonical)? Please help.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Jorge Castro, RolandiXor, dv3500ea, Gilles, Marco Ceppi Jul 18 '11 at 0:55

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

WUBI tends to break. A lot. I've updated my kernel before and broke it.

Another downside is say you want to use the alpha of 11.10 and you have a WUBI install on 10.10. DO NOT UPGRADE IT BREAKS IT.

share|improve this answer

Wubi is not as great. It even broke my windows boot loader . What i did is installed vmplanet from vmware(it's free). and installed ubuntu as a virtual machine. now i can have best of both worlds. For people like me who just can't get rid of windows, this seems to be the best solution.

share|improve this answer

Well, if you have a "proper" ubuntu install i.e not the one through windows, you can easily later remove Windows.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.