Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to this How to install software or upgrade from old unsupported release? question, EOL releases are archived to

But currently, I cannot see Ubuntu 12.10 and Ubuntu 13.04 to be available on this website, while all others(since 4.10) are available, as you can see in the screenshot below

enter image description here

So has canonical and/or Ubuntu devel-teams decided not to archive EOL releases any more? or is it work to be done?

share|improve this question
Raring is there: Wonder about Quantal too. – Danatela Jun 16 '14 at 5:43
@Danatela But it's not shown here – Registered User Jun 16 '14 at 5:51
up vote 11 down vote accepted

They don't transfer EOL immediately to, they keep them on or sometimes for a while. The cdimage one seems to get cleared faster. I don't know how this time period is determined or it's length it's just something I've noticed when downloading isos.

Ubuntu 12.10 Page =

Ubuntu 13.04 Page =

Remember their are also 3rd party mirrors sometimes available that may have older isos still available such as which still has 12.10 here:

share|improve this answer
Fine with the iso's, but where are the packages? The repos must have been archived somewhere? – Registered User Jun 16 '14 at 6:03
@RegisteredUser To my knowledge the apt repos are only on old-releases. You can also get some packages from as seen here: . You can manually download packages from 3rd party mirrors listed on – mango Jun 16 '14 at 6:13
@RegisteredUser are you familiar with the process of updating your apt sources.list to use – mango Jun 16 '14 at 6:18
yes I'm familiar. BTW I want to know the same thing. AFAIK packages are available on old.release but there are not there currently. – Registered User Jun 16 '14 at 6:20
The answer still does not answer the main point, i.e weather Ubuntu-devel-teams and/or canonical have any plan to archive 12.10 and following EOL releases. If it will be done only after 12.04 will be EOL as @Danatela said, can anyone source this news? – Registered User Jun 18 '14 at 13:15

Quantal has now appeared in the mirror! Happy Days :)

[obsolete answer follows] This week the main ubuntu mirror seemed to drop 12.10/quantal repository package pool altogether. Old-releases still has not picked it up, and like everyone else here, I'm struggling to find any information on future plans to do so (or not).

In the meantime, we found a repository that still contains some packages:

Currently we can only confirm the quantal and quantal-updates distributions, with main, and universe sections for each, restricted and multiverse are there but fairly incomplete.

While this does not answer the question I thought I'd document my resolution while there is still some life in at least one repository:

Mirror the repo locally

Here's an example of doing it with debmirror - I'm behind a corporate firewall that only allows http/s (no rsync or ftp), and requires authentication so I've accounted for those restrictions in my options. You'll need about 87GB for binary packages for i386 and amd64 architectures combined (from memory, sync still in progress here). I would triple that if you need source packages too:

sudo apt-get install debmirror
sudo debmirror --progress --verbose \
 --method=http --proxy=http://user:pass@proxy:port --dist=quantal,quantal-updates \
 --section=main,universe --arch=i386,amd64 --nosource /path/to/local/mirror/

Hope that helps -

share|improve this answer
There was mention of rolling releases in between LTS's a couple of months back. A rolling release would kill the need for archives for non LTS. But I would assume all would stay the same up to when this is decided (though the 13.04 going EOL before 12.10 was a surprise :D ) – Rinzwind Jul 18 '14 at 7:58
While the rolling release would get you out of a bind, a stable package environment, particularly in a production environment, is by far the more manageable option – cleary Jul 28 '14 at 2:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.