2

I guess BURG will require more time to start, because it displays some eye-candy graphics. If I replaced GRUB with BURG, would the time required to boot into Ubuntu be significantly longer?

Improve this question

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
3

I use burg since 1 year. It works well and I have never noticed a difference in boot time between grub and burg.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    Agree. I've used BURG & there is no significant lag.
    – FoleyIsGood
    May 16, 2011 at 18:12
2

Disclaimer: I havent tried out BURG.

Googling for Burg tells me that it is only a decorator for GRUB. That said, it will not do anything to change how your computer boots. So, coming back to your question, IMO, the time required for booting will not increase. Since burg only decorates GRUB, you might face a tiny lag before viewing BURG, but I reckon it wont me something you will notice.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    BURG is not a decorator for GRUB. Its a decorated replacement for GRUB. Its an independent bootloder, not and add-on
    – MestreLion
    Jun 22, 2011 at 16:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .