Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does using a extended cache (readyboost-like) improves the overall performance? I read a lot about it and some says that it's just for old machines with low RAM and also the 480mbit/s of usb2.0 was just too slow for cache, and others says that it improves no matter if you got high amounts of ram.

I ask this, because the answers that I found were from a time where usb3.0 was not a standart thing like it's now.

share|improve this question

Nowadays, extended cache is popular for folks with large databases, and research by Kang, Lee and Moon describes how custom coding to take advantage of flash memory can speed up PostgreSQL.

Bcache's author says it's dandy for RAID6 users, but his raw data also shows inconsistant performance as block sizes decrease, and he did not use USB3, he used an SSD on a SATA cable.

Therefore, I would say yes if you were running with RAID6 or PostgreSQL with the Kang, Lee and Moon code, but questionable otherwise.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer kiloseven. So i guess that for a home user there will be no diference at all... – Eddie Dec 17 '13 at 2:04
Maybe yes, maybe now, you could measure it and see, but I don't see anything published that's definitive. – K7AAY Dec 17 '13 at 16:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.