Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been thinking about switching to Ubuntu full time, but there are still some programs left behind that I haven't found any equivalent to yet. Does anyone know of a music player similar to Foobar2000 (I've read it doesn't handle well in WINE)?

share|improve this question
what exactly don't you wanna miss from foobar2000? – type May 19 '11 at 21:55
foobar2000 works better in wine than other windows-migrated software: I have tested (and they still work) specialized features like tags editing with plugins, lyrics download/display/embedding, converting audio files, detailed media library access with foo_facets. the way it looks is not that good , it's true, but there are tweaks that can be made that i didn't tried... for common use I don't like running Wine and therefore use DeaDBeef (see answer below) – cipricus Apr 3 '12 at 20:58
update: foobar works fine in wine, and even looks good - especially with improvements mentioned below (more on that here) – cipricus Jun 24 '13 at 22:41

DeadBeef is actively developed and in a way that brings it closer and closer to Foobar2000.

(what it lacks in Foobar2000-features (numbers of addons) it compensates in being light and up-to-the-point - the most straightforward and non-bloated music player/handler I have seen until now in Ubuntu).

With File browser plugin:

enter image description here

With Infobar plugin:

enter image description here

to install it:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:alexey-smirnov/deadbeef
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install deadbeef 

Or download as .deb and install (i686 or amd64)

To install plugins, wich are .so files, they should be put into a certain folder.


or: /usr/local/lib/deadbeef/

For the static portable version it is deadbeef-versionnumber/plugins

Considering problems of incompatibility and other issues in using the plugins, see this related answer

To convert audio files, see this question+answer.

Considering memory use, Deadbeef is much lighter than other players that might be considered foobar-like.

The latest versions (now 0.6.2) bring it even closer to foobar by the 'Designer mode' feature (similar to the layout editing mode in foobar) by which built-in or plugin features (file browser, infobar etc) are integrated to the interface:

enter image description here

enter image description here

File conversion is now very close to Foobar2000's - see the link above on conversion.

Already mentioned in answers, a great alternative is Clementine.

share|improve this answer

I like Clementine Install Clementine.

Exaile Install Exaile is an alternative. Look for Clementine in Ubuntu software Center

share|improve this answer
+1 For Clementine :) – red Jul 13 '11 at 8:41

Why no one mention DeadBeef

share|improve this answer
superb handling of playlists and of media library with a special file browser – cipricus Apr 3 '12 at 19:34

Try Guayadeque.

enter image description here

It is an extremely customizable music player, and should support most of the features you are looking for. I'm not sure if it will match foobar2000 100%, but at least it should fill the gap :)

share|improve this answer
++1 for Guayadeque – Takkat May 1 '11 at 21:39
++1 for Guayadeque from me too! – Rinzwind May 1 '11 at 21:43

Maybe you are happy with audacious Install audacious a lightweight skinnable player that can be extended with many plugins.

share|improve this answer

Wikipedia has a Comparison of audio player software which could be helpful.

Amarok seems to be a decent match functionality-wise, but it probably depends on which features are most important to you.

share|improve this answer

Honestly, I've been in the same position as you for years, looking for a comparable music player to Foobar2K in linux...

MPD & GMPC is good, as is gmusicbrowser... clementine is coming along nicely, but nothing can take the place of foobar for me, and thankfully with the newer builds of wine nothing has too - try installing winepulse from the ppa here

Listening to Foobar 1.1.7 on Natty right now, and it runs flawlessly :)

share|improve this answer
That or you could look into Amarok, Banshee, or Rhythmbox – zkriesse Jul 13 '11 at 4:35
daedbeef. as for Amarok, Banshee, or Rhythmbox, maybe having powerful new computers can be an obstacle against seeing that such players are excessively resource hungry and bloated considering what they do and what they ask (and considering the quality of other players like deadbeef, clementine or quod libet !) – cipricus Apr 3 '12 at 19:55
without media library foobar is as light as deadbeef. with media library still lighter than Exaile, Quod Libet, Amarok, Banshee, or Rhythmbox – cipricus Nov 16 '12 at 15:59

Foobar 2000 itself in Wine:

  • Foobar2000 was always related in my mind to the use of a lot of addons; but only when monitoring a large media library accessed through the 'Album List' or the 'Facets' addons does it becomes a bit heavy through Wine
    enter image description here

The image above that shows the use of 92MB of RAM is related to the use of a 270 GB media library. Otherwise, Foobar2000 in Wine is very light even with many addons.

But even in this case it looks lighter than very recommendable Ubuntu native players and it is not heavier than it used to be in Windows with the same addons installed.

And what about it's version without manually added addons and naked interface ? It looks extremely light!

enter image description here

Also, considering the looks of Foobar in Wine, a good method of improving this is:

1. enable font smoothing - fire one after the other these lines in Terminal:



(select third option in terminal)

2. install a windows msstyle file in Wine/Configure Wine/Desktop Integration enter image description here

3. increase the screen resolution in Wine/Configure Wine/Graphics enter image description here

It comes to smth like this (but colors and fonts are customizable): enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Don't forget Quod Libet (disclaimer: I'm one of the current devs)...

Album Browsing with search

It's popular with a lot of ex-Foobar users possibly due to the advanced tag editing features (including multi-tag support) and also complex searching with with regular expressions, boolean algebra, numeric aggregation etc.

Tag renaming

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.