What's the difference between installation from source (
./configure && make && make install) and with
I can think of these:
apt-getversion usually is more stable and less choice, while we can chose the specific version when install from source.
apt-getcan resolve dependencies automatically, can update/uninstall software easily, and has some other easy management goodness.
apt-getinstallation path follows a consistent pattern, and have some other conventions, which is convenient for SA.
But are there more?
- Can installation from source get better performance than via
apt-getfor some certain software, like
- Some other differences?
In a word, in which condition should I chose installation from source than
apt-get, except to get a specific version of that software?