Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've purchased a number of games (mostly through Humble Bundles) that have both a Linux version on Steam and a standalone Linux version.

Would there be any performance benefit to running the games as standalone versions instead of through Steam, or are there no differences?

I'm trying to decide how I want to install my games. If the game is the same with or without Steam, I will go with the Steam version, so all my games are in the same place and receive updates automatically. If there are performance or other benefits to the standalone versions, then I'll go with that.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The performance increase would be minimal. Steam isn't really that heavy on resources.

What I did was install e17 and run Steam from there. That makes a big difference if you turn off all the effects on first load for your user compared to unity-3d session.

TF2 went from almost playable to plays well for me.

share|improve this answer
I decided to go with steam-login (, but similar idea. Thanks! – Keidax Jun 7 '13 at 2:06

Well, I had war thunder standalone client and then moved to steam.

Before moving the game files to steam I was able to run it max with no framerate drops but after I got steam my framerate was extremely unstable, sometimes dipping to a framerate as low as 10fps.

This was the only game in which I encountered this problem so: not sure. Steam is generally very good though.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.