Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I keep seeing people saying make; make install is bad. I can't seem to find anyone with a reasonable explanation.

So, why is it bad? Or why does people tend to say "It's bad, use clear install instead" or alike?

share|improve this question
    
clean install not clear install but I see that stmt in relation to a re-install of Ubuntu not in case of installing a package. Are you not mixing things up? –  Rinzwind Mar 5 '13 at 11:19
    
Could be. My apologies in that case. –  Frederik Spang Mar 5 '13 at 11:45

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

You need make and make install to compile a software.

For the daily use it is better to run apt-get install to install a pre-compiles package. It's easier to use and ist easier to uninstall or check the version, etc. I think this is what people mean with "clear install", but I'm not sure.

But sometimes you need to install a software and there is no pre-compiled package in the repository or a installer for the package. In this case you will have to use configure, make and make install.

This is why I wouldn't say "it's bad". It is not the best way to install for dayly use, but sometimes it is just necessary.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.