Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Or in another words, why isn't there a separate ruby-1.9.2 package?

Source info:

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The 1.9.1 stands for the binary-compatibility version (and as you can read in the package description, ruby 1.9.2 is binary-compatible to ruby 1.9.1).

This is rather confusing - more explanations can be found here and here.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the links. Ugh, that's all I can say for Debian ruby packages maintainers. – Paweł Gościcki Feb 4 '11 at 13:11
Yeah, most of the ruby devs I know do rvm, binary install on their own, or really goof around with manipulating environment path variables to get gems/includes/versioning to work. Think metasploit. – RobotHumans Feb 4 '11 at 15:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.