Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I tried to fix my hard drive using Ubuntu but I found that message and didn't know what to do with.... I need to fix my bad sectors

fsck /dev/sdb  
fsck from util-linux 2.20.1  
e2fsck 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012)  
fsck.ext2: Permission denied while trying to open /dev/sdb  
You must have r/w access to the filesystem or be root  
share|improve this question
    
The text you've pasted doesn't seem related to your question - can you clarify? – thomasrutter Jan 14 '13 at 2:39

In the olden days you used to have to take a note of the badblocks that were written on the drive and enter those in the defect list before formatting the drive, because hard disk surfaces were never "perfect", manufacturer's got wise to this because people buying disks would look at the defect table printed on the disk and buy the ones with the least amount of defects...

Now scroll forward 20 or so years and hard disk manufacturers hide the fact a brand new disk has bad blocks with the firmware, when you buy a brand new disk it will have in all probability bad blocks already, the firmware will detect newly grown badblocks and maps them out from a set of spare cylinders it has, but this only happens when a write operation occurs on that sector and the ECC algorithm detects bit failure, only then will it map the block out. So getting back to the point you can force a drive to map out the badblocks by simply using DD, ie/

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1M

obviously alter the of=target to reflect the drive you want to zero this is the quickest way to re-map a drives defects, its also the quickest way to totally trash your linux setup by getting the target drive wrong, so check, double check then check again, before you press the enter key, you can increase the size of the blocksize in the dd command to make things go quicker but there are diminishing returns after a point, I find anything between 1M and 8M works best for me

You can get DD to just write one sector, the bad one... to get it remapped, so you don't have to backup your drive, but that's a whole different kettle of fish and Russian roulette if you don't know exactly what you're doing .....

This command WILL destroy everything on your hard drive including any partitions. But it will force the drive to map out any bad sectors it may have.

It is perfectly ok for a disk to have bad sectors as long as they aren't on the boot sector, if they are then the drive is useless, if you notice a few months later that your drive has developed more bad sectors then it's time to start shopping for a replacement.

I've revived hundreds of drives like this and they've lived on for many years afterwards, a bad sector isn't necessarily the death knell for the drive.....

share|improve this answer

I have answered the same question already.

In short: Boot a rescue system and use

badblocks -svn /dev/sda

to have the hard disk controller replace bad blocks by spare blocks.

Read more details here: http://askubuntu.com/a/490549/299014

share|improve this answer
2  
If you already answered this question you should vote to close it as a duplicate instead of re-answering it. – iharob Jun 13 '15 at 15:12
2  
You probably want to use this indirectly with fsck's -c option. AFAIK using badblocks standalone will never change the behaviour of anything, it will only report on where the bad blocks are. Of course, the drive firmware might transparently modify its behaviour when put under the usage patterns characteristic of badblocks, but surely this would be drive dependent? – amoe Nov 11 '15 at 14:13
    
As a new user you first need to gain "reputation" before being allowed to do certain activities on this site. So it was not possible to duplicate this. Still the question deserved an answer. As bad blocks are an issue of the physical disk (check out SMART values, the filesystem is not directly affected. It might suffer corruption due to data loss. So doing a fsck is a good idea as well. As original question was about how to "repair" bad blocks this was the answer. – user228505 Feb 1 at 2:24

A bad sector on a drive is a sign of permanent damage to the drive. Unless you have reason to believe that your drive marked these sectors as bad incorrectly, you cannot "fix" them.

It means that a part of your drive is damaged to the extent that it can no longer reliably be read from and/or written to.

Your system can continue to use the drive by marking that sector as unusable, but I'd generally recommend a drive replacement anyway, as often a bad sector can be a sign that more sectors, or the whole drive, may fail soon.

In fact, you can often force the drive to un-mark a sector as bad, and that sector will be usable again. However, it may stay like this, or it may become bad again, which is why this is not a good idea.

Now, as for the error message you've pasted in your question (as of my writing this), that error has nothing to do with bad sectors. It means that you don't have access to the drive. Being sudo can give you access, so:

sudo fsck /dev/sdb

However, this is still probably not what you want, because /dev/sdb refers to the entire drive, whereas fsck is designed to work on filesystems, which are usually (but not always, and you may have an exception here) placed in partitions. If the above didn't work, you may instead have wanted to do this to the 1st partition on that drive:

sudo fsck /dev/sdb1

You can get a list of partitions per drive with:

sudo fdisk -l
share|improve this answer
2  
Its probably just a bad block. It can't read the data, is all. After remapping the block the drive is likely good for another three years. So goes my experience. – Zan Lynx Jan 27 '15 at 20:53
    
A HDD with a bad sector is much, much more likely to fail at any moment than one which has never had a bad sector. How many drives is your experience based on? I would still call it a bigger gamble. – thomasrutter Jan 27 '15 at 23:45
    
More likely? Sure. But it isn't immediately doomed. So much depends on why that block went bad. Like I said, I've had drives that slowly remap a few bad blocks over their lifetime and just keep working. – Zan Lynx Jan 28 '15 at 0:00
    
it isn't immediately doomed - you have no way of knowing or guaranteeing that. In some cases it might be. So much depends on why that block went bad - it would be impossible to reliably find out the why, without opening it up and effectively destroying it. As I said it's always an increased risk. If you are absolutely fine with such a risk I have no problem with that. Most of the time, maybe even >90% of the time, the drive won't quickly fail after a bad sector is found and in some cases it might even last for years after. Keep good backups and any future failure won't hurt as much. – thomasrutter Jan 28 '15 at 0:50
    
Says "disk is mounted" and does nothing. – Dims Mar 24 at 19:59

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.