Sign up ×
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free.

I have tried (and failed) to install Ubuntu 12.10 on a legacy HP/Compaq workstation (an Evo PRO). This did not surprise me, I'd guessed at a 30:70 success:fail ratio and was right. The issue is running Compiz into a generic driver, and on into legacy firmware. I'd done by best, the firmware revision of the box was the latest, but this was released around the XP/Vista transition.

The feeling is that 12.10 is developed around new graphics features, and simply does not want to know about legacy display adapters. if this is so, then frankly I am on-side and support this position. My solution was to do what I'm supposed to do and use 12.04.

Its a pity that !2.10 has no 2G or legacy support, but understandable none the less. Should however this be implicit on the tin?

Regards and thanks / Ed

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Bruno Pereira Jan 11 '13 at 17:39

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer 1

Actually, The workings of 12.10 and even 13.04 are proven by my own box running Lubuntu. I upgraded the "old" tin using the "latest" athlon 64 for socket 462. Just to give you an idea for how Legecy it is. The video card is a ATI 9800 pro which came from a Windows ME box.

Best I can say is try Lubuntu here it revived my box.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.