Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

First of all, I'm aware of threads like Comparison of backup tools.

With that in mind, I have a specific set of requirements for backup, and I was wondering which are the current options - the informations around are fragmented and confusing, especially considering that online drives are not backup solutions.

My requirements are the following:

  • be able to backup individual files (ie. no dejadup, thanks)
  • cloud storage (upload of an intermediate backup archive is not viable)
  • have a daemon running in the background, backing up at least at time intervals (optionally, having a continuous backup)
  • no need to setup a server
  • file versioning
  • ability to handle large data sets (number of files rather than space)
  • ability to backup drives that are not guaranteed to be mounted, without hassles


  • restore from the backup structure of a given point in time. this is different from restoring from the current backup tree, with the option of choosing older versions.
  • reporting

Price doesn't matter.

Excluded solutions:

  • JungleDisk was perfect, until the moment it's been discontinued.
  • SpiderOak is really badly coded; It has annoying bugs, and it hangs on large number of files. Also, if a drive is not mounted when SO starts, it won't be backed up.
  • Symform has a bug in the registration. Since you can't contact support without registering, it's completely useless.
share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I don't know about minimal setup, but otherwise CrashPlan should meet your requirements. Actually CrashPlans setup is anything but minimal. :(

share|improve this answer
until now, Crashplan looks a viable choice. I've corrected the question as you pointed with a more appropriate wording (I didn't want to setup a server, essentially). – Marcus Jan 2 '13 at 18:06
Note that Crashplan is also poorly coded, and will fill your root directory with backup files if you ever have a destination drive unmounted when it wants to write, or if you use an encrypted /home (it runs before you login and can mount /home). Avoid. – Tom Brossman Jan 2 '13 at 21:19
@TomBrossman Does this hold even if home has been encrypted as part of the Ubuntu-installation? – Konstantin Schubert Jan 3 '13 at 9:13
@Konstantin Correct. If you have an encrypted /home directory, you can't use Crashplan. You might try to fix the bug yourself, or come up with a workaround. It's a commercial product and other superior products exist so I went elsewhere. – Tom Brossman Jan 3 '13 at 10:03
@TomBrossman can you elaborate on the superior products? That's what I'm actually looking for. – Marcus Jan 3 '13 at 11:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.