Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently bought new USB 3.0 flash drive (write speed: 110 MB/s, read speed: 190 MB/s). And I have Dell XPS 13 (it has SSD and USB 3.0).

My problem is speed of copying files to the USB flash stick.

When I formatted it to FAT32 or EXT2, EXT3, EXT4, the speed was around 100 MB/s. But with NTFS it's only around 20-30 MB/s.

But I don't think the problem is writing data to the USB stick. It seems the problem is reading from SSD when I'm copying files to the NTFS drive. Because when I look to the indicator-multiload, the read speed is around 30 MB/s, but the write is around 100 MB/s (see the graph: http://ubuntuone.com/3zHzUFfR9QGjeV62Qpq6va).

Another proof is simple program that I wrote in Java, which only read data from SSD and write them to USB stick. The speed with this program was also around 100 MB/s.

Does anybody know, how to improve native copying (cp command) to get the full speed with NTFS drive?

Thank you very much!

PS: I'm new Ubuntu user.

EDIT:

I test it now with 3.9 GB file:

CTRL+C/CTRL+V in Nautilus: 1:58 (34 MB/s)
Command "cp": 1:39 (40 MB/s)
Java program: 0:44 (90 MB/s)

EDIT 2:

If anyone wants to try it. Here is the program (for Java 7), that I used (source + compiled): http://ubuntuone.com/0KQgANrgN17izZm5fDPayJ

To test it, just cd to the bin folder and run:

java NtfsCopy source destination

or run:

java NtfsCopy

to see the usage.

NOTICE: Please notice that this program has not been tested, so use it at your own risk. To check if the file was copied correctly, use md5sum or sha1sum or something similar.

share|improve this question
    
the actual performances of your USB devices depend on the a) BIOS b) OS/kernel c) driver d) filesystem . For NTFS it's natural to under-perform especially when compared to really new FS like ext4. –  user1849534 Dec 25 '12 at 15:06
    
Well, but why is the Java program faster? –  Iceman Dec 26 '12 at 16:16
    
I am getting interested too now. NTFS is indeed slower. –  Dr_Bunsen Dec 26 '12 at 16:26
    
@Dr_Bunsen You can try the Java program, see my EDIT 2. –  Iceman Dec 26 '12 at 20:33
    
@Iceman, nice piece of code there. I think I will use it the next time I have to transfer big stuff ;). Definitely something worth keeping. But for your question, I think it's really the difference in code, nothing more. Look up the source of Nautilus and cp. –  Dr_Bunsen Dec 27 '12 at 11:01
add comment

2 Answers

You don't know whether the problem is reading from the SSD or writing to the USB. So, instead of copying SSD -> USB, try copying SSD -> Hard Drive -> USB.

share|improve this answer
1  
I'm almost sure, the problem is reading from the SSD. Take a look here, this is graph from indicator-multiload: ubuntuone.com/3zHzUFfR9QGjeV62Qpq6va. Anyway I don't have HDD, I have only SSD. –  Iceman Dec 27 '12 at 20:34
add comment

I had the same problems copying files from ext4 to NTFS. But, in my case, they were on the same physical disk, just different partitions. However, I've found out in the tests, that using rsync is faster as I got 80kB/s on average.

share|improve this answer
    
You're welcome. Just notice that the program has not been tested, so use it at your own risk. To check if the file was copied correctly, use md5sum or sha1sum or something similar. –  Iceman Jul 25 '13 at 21:34
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.