Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know this is an old topic, but I still have a problem to find a good alternative, maybe I have high standards.

There is a 4 years old article about this.

But the question is, why is Nautilus so bad in two pane mode? Why is it so slow when browsing folders? And, why are all other file managers from article so ugly?

I like Krusader, but it does not looks near as good as Nautilus.

Is Nautilus slow because of the fancy GUI rendering? Is it hard to make file manager which fits nice in Unity?

What is your experience and what file manager are you using?

EDIT:

I got interesting results by making Krusader look native in Unity. I like it now.

enter image description here

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by dobey, nitstorm, Takkat, belacqua, Jorge Castro Nov 7 '12 at 0:16

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. Please have a look at the What kind of questions should I not ask here? section of the faq. –  nitstorm Nov 6 '12 at 18:27
    
possible duplicate of Are there any alternatives to Nautilus? –  Takkat Nov 6 '12 at 20:35
    
@Takkat We are not looking for alternatives to Nautilus, but to Total Commander, so it can't be duplicate of "Are there any alternatives to Nautilus?" –  umpirsky Nov 7 '12 at 6:45
add comment

3 Answers 3

Well, honestly I like to put here a great answer to you, but I cannot. Still I can't find an equal program to Total Commander on ubuntu. I'm thinking same way like you about on nautilus and krusader.

Additionally I had needed a good FTP client like on Total Commander.

So I have ended with 2 programs.

  1. Double Commander http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/

    • (+) similar interface
    • (+) easy to use
    • (-) horrible ftp client
  2. BS Commander http://www.beesoft.org/index.php?id=bsc

    • (+) similar interface
    • (-) low functionality and configuration

P.S : Even I'm thinking about starting a open source project for making something total commander.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for your answer, I like Double Commander, too bad there is no Ubuntu package. If you start your open source project, pay attention on performances, Unity integration, .svg non blur icon and nice two pane browsing experience. Good luck. –  umpirsky Nov 6 '12 at 13:31
    
If you are starting a open source file manager, maybe you can fork Thunar and just make it work with two panes. I think it would be perfect. –  umpirsky Nov 7 '12 at 6:37
add comment

All other file managers in the article are ugly, because as you have pointed out that article is dated four years back. So most of the tools in that article are bound to look outdated(Its from that time period).
For good(new age) alternatives to Nautilus, please refer this post:
Are there any alternatives to Nautilus?
Another list of alternatives, with screenshots:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/06/daily-5-5-alternative-file-managers

Personally I like the Kde default file manager Dolphin, after Nautilus.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I liked Thunar and PCMan, but they are both missing two pane experience we have in Total Commander, Krusader and others. –  umpirsky Nov 6 '12 at 13:33
    
@umpirsky, You could upvote this answer if it helped you. ;) –  saji89 Nov 7 '12 at 4:38
add comment

Maybe you like the midnight commander. It's a terminal program but quite capable. It's true terminal style! Terminal is never ugly.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.