Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why are the fonts in Document Viewer so ugly and non-antialiased?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
could you perhaps give a link to a sample file? The fonts look fine in my pdfs. – adempewolff Aug 22 '12 at 7:20
up vote 5 down vote accepted

My guess is that you see this behavior only for some documents, right?

In that case I think that you see output from an old LaTeX version with standard LaTeX bitmap fonts. I have found the document that you are showing and the fonts are non-aliased also on my system -- although I know that regular documents look perfect. It's also non-aliased under Windows, so there.

share|improve this answer
You're exactly right. The DVI-to-PDF conversion was done improperly. – izx Aug 22 '12 at 7:38
Oh, so I can't help it seems. Well, we'll live through it - with a cold beer in hand the fonts doesn't really matter. – Primož Kralj Aug 22 '12 at 7:50
If you print it, it will look "normal". – izx Aug 23 '12 at 7:10

There is no text in your pdf file, but a compressed jpeg image for each page.

So the font cannot scale. It is a fixed picture, not a scalable font.

share|improve this answer
Nah, there is text alright: It's just that it doesn't use vector fonts. – January Aug 22 '12 at 7:36
The main font is of poor Quality... it is a type 3 font. Type 3 Fonts are bitmap fonts -> same problem like with other "pictures" they are not scalable. – mondjunge Aug 22 '12 at 7:45
@mondjunge: Type 3 fonts are not of poor quality. They are simply not optimized for low resolution devices like screens. – Martin Schröder Aug 23 '12 at 6:50
What Martin said. Your answer is incorrect in that there is no "compressed image for each page", JPEG or otherwise. – izx Aug 23 '12 at 7:11
You are correct, the first time I downloaded the pdf it was copy protected, so I could not highlight any chars, so I thought it was a jpeg... – mondjunge Aug 23 '12 at 13:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.