Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is GNOME classic (no effects) faster than Unity 2D?

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I think the person better equiped to answer this question is you, by trying both and doing the same tasks, and then comparing.

Both WM, don't use compositing so they present the applications directly on screen, what can be faster if you don't have a high end graphic card.

From what i read, it seems that Gnome Fallback could be a little faster, but there's not real data tests to prove it.

So my advise is, install both, run the same application (play a video for example) on both, and measure the times.

share|improve this answer

GNOME classic, for me, is faster than Unity 2D.

Programs like firefox and thundewrbird usually start and run faster.

However, the improvement in speed is almost negligable. If you want more speed, I would get XFCE or LXDE.

RazorQT is also good, but its in-dev still.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.