Take the 2-minute tour ×
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently installed a vendor supplied embedded linux onto a hardware device. When I ran lsmod on the device command line the response was empty. I was lead to believe that this means that the drivers for the hardware running on the device had been built into the kernel rather than as .ko files. My question is this: how does this process happen?

Is support for popular hardware gradually integrated into the kernel in subsequent versions thus replacing the .ko files? Is the .ko file simply used to support new hardware that doesn't have kernel integrated driver support at the time of release? In my limited knowledge I thought that all hardware drivers were of the form of .ko files but clearly this is wrong.

I am slightly confused by the whole process and would be grateful for clarification as I have a feeling that I may be looking at the situation the wrong way.

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Core drivers that are considered critical to the loading of the kernel are usually built into the kernel, while other hardware drivers, etc. are built as modules or .ko files.

The .ko modules are usually stored under the /lib directory on your root partition. To use any of these, the kernel must first be able to detect and access the underlying storage device and then access its filesystem. So it's safe to assume that a kernel without SATA/SCSI and ext2/3/4 support built-into it won't really boot ;)

You can choose to switch most built-in kernel drivers into module form. The Ubuntu kernel team decides whether to modify the Linux kernel team's default configuration and include/exclude additional built-in drivers for the stock kernel images you download.

If you build your own kernel, you can do the same:

enter image description here

  • In the above screenshot, the * indicates a built-in driver, while M indicates a module.
  • Loopback device support, which is often essential to booting a system, is built-in by default.
  • The low-speed USB driver (USB 1.0) is also built-in by default to allow you to boot off a USB stick, but here I have changed it into a module.
share|improve this answer
    
Thanks that helps a lot. I guess I will get a better understanding of this when I eventually do a kernel build from scratch for myself. –  mathematician1975 Jul 13 '12 at 23:11
add comment

These depends on how you have configured your build of the linux kernel.

Within a compilation process you usually can:

  • compile the kernel with or without module support ( often it comes with module support )
  • compile a driver as module or as a built-in piece of software right into the kernel

to understand what a .ko file is for http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10476990/difference-between-o-and-ko-file

The reason why you have an empty output on lsmod is because you have a monolithic kernel.

A quick way for listing all your modules ( if they are present ) is by running this command

find /lib/modules/*/ -type f -iname '*.ko' | less

notice the use of less, you can use every pager that you want or redirect the output where you want to.

share|improve this answer
    
So on a kernel configured without module support (as mine appears to be) I would be unable to install any drivers in the form of .ko files to use additional hardware? –  mathematician1975 Jul 13 '12 at 23:13
    
yes, basically you have to recompile it from the source, if you want to edit and/or add drivers you have to rebuild it, maybe just use the same .config file and modify it as you need. –  user827992 Jul 13 '12 at 23:15
    
So in order to do this I would need to get the kernel source from the vendor, compile it myself with the correct modifications to the .config file then I will be good to install other drivers? –  mathematician1975 Jul 13 '12 at 23:25
    
depends, if he used a vanilla kernel ( without nothing more than the original source code ) you are ok with just the .config and you can reproduce the same kernel just with your pc, however if he used a vanilla kernel + some patches or modifications you need this extra informations, a custom Makefile could be also considered as a relevant variable as any other modifications to the standard toolchain and in general to the standard build process. –  user827992 Jul 13 '12 at 23:31
add comment

When compiling a kernel, you get to configure which components are installed. Not only that, but you get to chose whether or not they are built into the kernel or if they are a module.

For example, many people use the ext2 filesystem on their /boot partition. Because of this, the kernel must be able to read ext2 filesystems at boot time. In order to accomplish this, the ext2 module is built into the kernel itself.

Now, imagine the quantity of modules available. It wouldn't make sense to have them all built into your kernel, would it? This is why you can build these as separate .ko modules and load them at will.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes your last paragraph is what motivated my question to be honest. Thanks for the answer –  mathematician1975 Jul 13 '12 at 23:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.