Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

Note: Re the suggestion that this question is a duplicate of How to understand the Ubuntu file system layout? – This question asks specifically what etc and usr mean, ie. what English word(s) did they derrive from. Answers to this question may refer to the functions the directories serve, but this is either to help explain the origin of the name, or is just coincidental information.

I can relate to acronyms and abbreviations much more readily when I actually know how they were derrived.

It is oftn pssble to wrk out wht an abrvtion means if you know the the root words behind it... but unfortunately etc is a standard abbreviation for "et-cetera"... and for usr I think of "user"... but I can't see any correlation.

Most of the terse names in Linux actually make sense when I finally work out the expanded original normal words behind them..

Are the origins of these abbreviations lost in the mists of time, or are they "obvious" to all but me?

This question was promted by a comment I read yesterday, where someone described these things as Linux incantations ... I sympathize with him :)...

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Lucio, Pilot6, A.B., David Foerster, Eric Carvalho Aug 23 '15 at 14:05

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Here's a relevant Server Fault question with plenty of interesting info:… – Jonik Nov 4 '10 at 11:06
up vote 25 down vote accepted

As you suspected, /etc is from etcetera, unhelpfully named for "where everything else goes", and /usr was for "user applications". A lot of the detail on the history of the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard is documented on Wikipedia.

share|improve this answer
I'll check your link... but I've also heard that /etc meant Editable Text Configuration, and /usr means U(forget) System Resources(?)... It isn't anything critical, but I'd just like to know the original wording, way back when.... – Peter.O Nov 4 '10 at 6:08
Editable Text Configuration seems to be a "backronym" and not the true origin. – Kees Cook Nov 4 '10 at 6:11
Okay... If the origina Bell-Labs comments says "etc" means et-cetera... I'm happy with that .... and Okay again for /usr meaning "(multi-)user utilities and applications" ... Thanks... I missed the forest for the trees... – Peter.O Nov 4 '10 at 6:17
...Backronym :) – Peter.O Nov 4 '10 at 6:49

I heard that /usr was for *U*nix *S*ystem *R*esources.

share|improve this answer
I don't think is was, but it is now! – Martin Owens -doctormo- Nov 4 '10 at 9:37
Thanks... Ah, "Unix"; that's the one I had heard of and couldn't quite recall... I certainly now have meaningful phrases to associate with abbreviations :) ... – Peter.O Nov 4 '10 at 10:54
+1 That indeed seems to be the case:… – Jonik Nov 4 '10 at 11:05

/etc is an abbreviation for etcetera, as I'm sure you guessed... It's the directory which stores all of your configuration files. /usr, as you guessed, is the directory where "user" files reside; it contains all of the items that are not part of the system itself such as user programs and data. System programs are stored in /bin, user programs in /usr/bin, or, in Ubuntu, in /usr/share/. TuxFiles has a good description of the Linux directory structure.

share|improve this answer
Dang, ninja'd! All yours, Kees. – Nick Pascucci Nov 4 '10 at 6:02
The directory isn't "et-ceteras" in nature .. etc-cetera means "and sundries"... As far as I can see, there is anything but sundries in "/etc" ... I have heard (somewhere) that it means "Editable Text Configuration".. This makes sense to me, but I's still kike to know it that was the original meaning... (maybe Linus Torvals or Richard Stallman would know for certain :) – Peter.O Nov 4 '10 at 6:02
I can't see why either of those two people would know fred. I think the terms goes way back to Unix/POSIX and isn't a Linux or Gnu term. – Martin Owens -doctormo- Nov 4 '10 at 6:12
They probably would, but the directory structure is actually a holdover from UNIX. We've developed in our methods of storing things; for example, /home/ isn't standard in UNIX or BSD directory structures, it's a new-ish development that is associated primarily with Linux. /usr/home is generally more common for old-style systems. It may have been that in the past /etc/ was used more for bits and pieces, but we've developed it to a more dedicated area for conf files. <- This slashdot thread has a post indicating this concept. – Nick Pascucci Nov 4 '10 at 6:12
Thanks.. good info... I'll now think of /etc as "et-cetera"* with a lot of "Editable Text Configs" in it.... and /usr as "User system resources", because that's what it seems to hold.. I'll work with that mental image, unless someone points out that I'm off the track – Peter.O Nov 4 '10 at 6:36

The abbrevation "usr" of "/usr" does not mean user. That was only until 10 years ago or so. Since around 2000 it's now the abbrevation for "Unix System Resources".

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.